• Home
  • CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] vs. IBM Engineering Workflow Management

CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] and IBM Engineering Workflow Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL]?
Suvajit Chakraborty
Offers good traceability elements but UI needs improvement
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition."
  • "It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements."
  • "It is not a free tool. We use a token-based licensing model, which is specific to IBM. The cost per token is around $115-$120."

    • More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
    Top Answer:We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Engineering W...
    Top Answer:Customers need to pay for a license to use this product. It is not a free tool. We use a token-based licensing model, which is specific to IBM. We have about 7,800 tokens, and including maintenance… more »
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What needs improvement with IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in the UI. The UI has to improve a lot compared to the competitive tools, like Atlassian Jira, for example. It's very easy to use. It is easy to manage and easy to use… more »
    Read all 6 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
    10th
    out of 19 in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
    Views
    747
    Comparisons
    306
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    1,076
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC
    Learn More
    Broadcom
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    CA Application Lifecycle Conductor, creates one view and traceability across the application lifecycle from mobile to mainframe. It improves business agility by removing barriers to faster time to market and improved reliability. With CA ALC, customers can: Establish continuous feedback loops to improve governance, auditability, traceability and Mobile to Mainframe transparency; Simplify and store complex test relationships to automate and speed Mainframe testing; and Coordinate deployment with your preferred Application Release Automation solution to streamline code releases.

    IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company22%
    Government12%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise80%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while IBM Engineering Workflow Management is ranked 10th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 14 reviews. CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] is rated 0.0, while IBM Engineering Workflow Management is rated 6.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Engineering Workflow Management writes "Offers good traceability elements but UI needs improvement ". CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] is most compared with , whereas IBM Engineering Workflow Management is most compared with Jira, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Codebeamer, GitLab and Polarion ALM.

    We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.