CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] vs SmarteSoft comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] and SmarteSoft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
Views
59
Comparisons
44
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
SmarteSoft
Video Not Available
Overview
CA Application Lifecycle Conductor, creates one view and traceability across the application lifecycle from mobile to mainframe. It improves business agility by removing barriers to faster time to market and improved reliability. With CA ALC, customers can: Establish continuous feedback loops to improve governance, auditability, traceability and Mobile to Mainframe transparency; Simplify and store complex test relationships to automate and speed Mainframe testing; and Coordinate deployment with your preferred Application Release Automation solution to streamline code releases.
SmarteSoft Application Lifecycle Management is a real-time collaboration, access to a centralized data repository, cross-tool and cross-project visibility, better project monitoring and reporting are the keys to developing quality software in less time. SmarteQM seamlessly integrates all these priorities, optimizing the experience of Integrated Application Lifecycle Management, or Integrated ALM; all the tools and users are synchronized with each other throughout the application development stages. This integration ensures that every team member knows who, what, when, and why of any changes made during the development process and there is no last-minute surprise causing delivery delays or project failure.
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
New Zealand Blood Service, Columbian Financial Group, Proxibid, Entegraty Professional Services, Fremont Investment & Loan, Indiana Pension Systems, Posera Software, Lockheed Martin Space & Strategic Missiles, Allaire Corporation, ADP, PacifiCare, VP Technology
Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while SmarteSoft is ranked 30th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] is rated 0.0, while SmarteSoft is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CA Application Lifecycle Conductor [EOL] is most compared with , whereas SmarteSoft is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.