• Home
  • CA Application Test [EOL] vs. IBM Rational Functional Tester

CA Application Test [EOL] vs IBM Rational Functional Tester comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Application Test [EOL] and IBM Rational Functional Tester based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use CA Application Test [EOL]?
Hellen Zhang
Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support
The solution has provided more accurate results with database verification.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price."

    • More IBM Rational Functional Tester Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about IBM Rational Functional Tester?
    Top Answer:Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What needs improvement with IBM Rational Functional Tester?
    Top Answer:The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework. The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run. The reason is that changes were made to… more »
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for IBM Rational Functional Tester?
    Top Answer:The solution is used for test automation, and test data creation.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Functional Testing Tools
    21st
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    1,349
    Comparisons
    781
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    225
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Rational Functional Tester
    Learn More
    Broadcom
    IBM
    Overview
    CA Application Test automates QA and testing with a scriptless mobile device, composite app and API testing tool. It is a collaborative automated testing solution designed to test and validate modern Web and mobile applications along with the APIs, Web services and legacy backend protocols. The expansive protocol support means that actions taken to invoke a business process or rule from the UI or API can be validated in the implementing technology. It features a codeless testing framework that enables multiple cross-functional team members to design and execute automated unit, functional, regression, integration and performance tests covering modern through legacy technologies.
    IBM Rational Functional Tester is an automated functional testing and regression testing tool. This software provides automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI, and data-driven testing. Rational Function Tester supports a range of applications, such as web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, PowerBuilder, Ajax, Adobe Flex, Dojo Toolkit, GEF, Adobe PDF documents, zSeries, iSeries, and pSeries.
    Sample Customers
    Conway, T Mobile
    Edumate
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Insurance Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise56%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Application Test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 21st in Functional Testing Tools with 8 reviews. CA Application Test [EOL] is rated 0.0, while IBM Rational Functional Tester is rated 7.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational Functional Tester writes "Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support". CA Application Test [EOL] is most compared with Bitbar, whereas IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Katalon Studio, Selenium HQ, HCL OneTest, Tricentis Tosca and Worksoft Certify.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.