CA Application Test [EOL] vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Application Test [EOL] and Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Functional Testing Tools
Unranked
In Functional Testing Tools
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Service Test, HPE Service Test
Learn More
Overview
CA Application Test automates QA and testing with a scriptless mobile device, composite app and API testing tool. It is a collaborative automated testing solution designed to test and validate modern Web and mobile applications along with the APIs, Web services and legacy backend protocols. The expansive protocol support means that actions taken to invoke a business process or rule from the UI or API can be validated in the implementing technology. It features a codeless testing framework that enables multiple cross-functional team members to design and execute automated unit, functional, regression, integration and performance tests covering modern through legacy technologies.

Micro FocusĀ Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro FocusĀ LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

Sample Customers
Conway, T Mobile
John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA Application Test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools. CA Application Test [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] writes "We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night". CA Application Test [EOL] is most compared with Bitbar, whereas Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.