• Home
  • CA Application Test [EOL] vs. OpenText Silk Test

CA Application Test [EOL] vs OpenText Silk Test comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo

CA Application Test [EOL]

views| comparisons
OpenText Logo

OpenText Silk Test

Read 16 OpenText Silk Test reviews
1,719 views|1,168 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Application Test [EOL] and OpenText Silk Test based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use CA Application Test [EOL]?
SrinivasPakala
Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."
  • "We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

    • More OpenText Silk Test Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Functional Testing Tools
    25th
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    1,719
    Comparisons
    1,168
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test
    Learn More
    Broadcom
    OpenText
    Overview
    CA Application Test automates QA and testing with a scriptless mobile device, composite app and API testing tool. It is a collaborative automated testing solution designed to test and validate modern Web and mobile applications along with the APIs, Web services and legacy backend protocols. The expansive protocol support means that actions taken to invoke a business process or rule from the UI or API can be validated in the implementing technology. It features a codeless testing framework that enables multiple cross-functional team members to design and execute automated unit, functional, regression, integration and performance tests covering modern through legacy technologies.
    SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
    Sample Customers
    Conway, T Mobile
    Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Application Test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while OpenText Silk Test is ranked 25th in Functional Testing Tools. CA Application Test [EOL] is rated 0.0, while OpenText Silk Test is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Silk Test writes "Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available". CA Application Test [EOL] is most compared with Bitbar, whereas OpenText Silk Test is most compared with Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, OpenText UFT Developer, Apache JMeter and froglogic Squish.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.