CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] vs IBM WebSphere BPMS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] and IBM WebSphere BPMS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Process Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Jobs are planned automatically to eliminate the need to plan them manually. It also saves us effort because there is no need to create job objects manually.""It provides a simple reduction of headcount and also a reduction of run through time.""The product is stable. This is the reason that we are using Automic, in some cases, because of its stability and features.""If I have a higher workload with smaller machines, it is easy to increase everything."

More CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] Pros →

"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good.""We like the feature in which we can trace back instances.""This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."

More IBM WebSphere BPMS Pros →

Cons
"In the last two years or so, Automic has not invested as much in the product as we would have expected.""What I am missing today is robotics. If Automic would like to stay as one of the biggest automation engines on the market, they have to find an option with a robotics solution."

More CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] Cons →

"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further.""Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason.""The solution lacks acceptable stability."

More IBM WebSphere BPMS Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "From our clients, "We have reduced headcounts since the beginning by around 30 to 40 percent." and "We are much faster using the service orchestration and saving by a factor of 10 or more.""
  • More CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Process Automation
    31st
    out of 64 in Process Automation
    Views
    123
    Comparisons
    87
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Process Automation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    WebSphere BPMS
    Learn More
    Overview

    Service orchestration enables organizations to extract the most value from their investments in people and technology. Because time spent waiting for a service request means wasted money and lost opportunity.

    Service orchestration can intelligently automate the sometimes complex sequence of tasks required to deliver a service. Whether those tasks need to be executed on-premises or in the cloud, on virtual or physical systems, or even using leading-edge technologies like microservices or containers, service orchestration ensures that those tasks are executed accurately and efficiently. This maximizes productivity and enables businesses to move at digital speeds.


    Information Not Available
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia
    Buyer's Guide
    Process Automation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Process Automation while IBM WebSphere BPMS is ranked 31st in Process Automation. CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] is rated 10.0, while IBM WebSphere BPMS is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] writes "Automation of job object creation increased the quality and quantity of our job requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM WebSphere BPMS writes "Standardizes and automates business processes for efficiency ". CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] is most compared with , whereas IBM WebSphere BPMS is most compared with .

    See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.