We performed a comparison between CA CEM [EOL] and Catchpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.Earn 20 points
CA CEM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Catchpoint is ranked 18th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 12 reviews. CA CEM [EOL] is rated 6.0, while Catchpoint is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CA CEM [EOL] writes "It provides a powerful network analysis both with individual transactions and general network performance. We've had lots of hardware issues with the MPMs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Catchpoint writes "The UI is well designed, so it's easy to get the visibility you want". CA CEM [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Catchpoint is most compared with Dynatrace, ThousandEyes, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and Selenium HQ.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.