• Home
  • CA CEM [EOL] vs. JenniferSoft

CA CEM [EOL] vs JenniferSoft comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo

CA CEM [EOL]

Read 1 CA CEM [EOL] review
views| comparisons
0% willing to recommend
JenniferSoft Logo

JenniferSoft

Read 1 JenniferSoft review
241 views|164 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA CEM [EOL] and JenniferSoft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
It provides a powerful network analysis both with individual transactions and general network performance. We've had...
We've found that it really helps managers in measuring application SLAs and viewing historical performance data.
MinLee
Easy to deploy, stable, and scalable
report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about JenniferSoft?
Top Answer:The dashboard is a valuable feature.
What needs improvement with JenniferSoft?
Top Answer:The solution is pricy and has room for improvement.
What is your primary use case for JenniferSoft?
Top Answer:I use JenniferSoft to monitor the performance and transaction traces of our applications.
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
50th
out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
241
Comparisons
164
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
216
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
CEM
Learn More
Broadcom
JenniferSoft
Overview
CA Customer Experience Manager (CA CEM) is a product within the Application Performance Management solution that measures web application performance for each individual customer. CA CEM measures the performance and quality of customer transactions, identifies defects and variance, and quantifies the impact on customers and the business. CA CEM lets you monitor real user activities -- including login, account update, or purchase transactions -- at the business service level. By proactively detecting trends in degraded customer transaction response times and providing various actionable reports, CA CEM lets you act before problems occur or SLAs are out of compliance. These capabilities enable both your business managers and IT staff to understand and resolve performance problems before end users call for support.

JenniferSoft Application Performance Management (APM) is a system management methodology that focuses on monitoring and managing application software performance and service utilization. Also, it is a tool that helps system availability and stable operation by monitoring and analyzing performance of operating systems. JENNIFER provides comprehensive and integrated performance monitoring through its many dashboard views, which include Real-user Monitoring and Real-time Topology. JENNIFER analyzes statistical data regarding system resources, application performance and errors with a view to achieving continuous and optimal service availability. JENNIFER's continuous monitoring helps with rapid detection and troubleshooting of performance problems. That can help prevent the problems from affecting service availability later. And minimizing system downtime and improving overall performance at the application and system levels greatly improves customer satisfaction.

Sample Customers
First Horizon National Corporation, Olympus, Petroleum Company of Trinidad and Tobago LimitedŒ _Petrotrinî, Racing and Wagering Western Australia
Standard Charter, SAS, SK, Mini Stop, AIG, SMBC, Prudential, Samsung, 3M, Meritz, LG, CJ, Pasco, Metr Asia Capital
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA CEM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while JenniferSoft is ranked 50th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 1 review. CA CEM [EOL] is rated 6.0, while JenniferSoft is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CA CEM [EOL] writes "It provides a powerful network analysis both with individual transactions and general network performance. We've had lots of hardware issues with the MPMs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JenniferSoft writes "Easy to deploy, stable, and scalable". CA CEM [EOL] is most compared with , whereas JenniferSoft is most compared with Grafana.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.