We performed a comparison between CA CEM [EOL] and OpenText Business Process Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.Earn 20 points
CA CEM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is ranked 57th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. CA CEM [EOL] is rated 6.0, while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CA CEM [EOL] writes "It provides a powerful network analysis both with individual transactions and general network performance. We've had lots of hardware issues with the MPMs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Process Monitoring writes "Stable with good performance visibility but is a discontinued product". CA CEM [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText Business Process Monitoring is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Datadog.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
