"To me, the most valuable feature of Clarity CA is the timesheet. It's the only feature I use because I just support the tool, and I just enter time on it. Others use Clarity CA for other purposes, such as resource management, project management, scheduling, and financials. The tool also has a fairly simple integration with other systems, so at the moment, it's working fine. I also like that you can write your own code in Clarity CA, and you can make changes to it based on your needs."
"The stability and reliability are great."
"The market share of VMware is huge. It is not even necessary to prove the capabilities attached to the product."
"vCenter alone is enough for me because vCenter is a cluster environment and cluster solution for virtualization environments."
"My experience working with this solution has been good and I recommend it."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is the virtual machine management across different hosts, located in different areas."
"I like vMotion because it manages fault tolerance."
"It has many valuable features that serve many purposes."
"The clustering part and the load balancing part are most valuable."
"What could be improved in Clarity CA is its UI, but I know the Clarity team is working on a new UI, so I'm expecting its UI to get better. The software also has too many functions, so it would be good if the functions or features could be split up, rather than needing to buy the whole Clarity CA package, when you'll only use a few of its functions. This increases the cost of the software, so that's another area for improvement. How Clarity CA is marketed could also be improved."
"The Self Service Interface is not very good and it needs improvement."
"The solution should allow for more customization."
"The reporting could be improved."
"The pricing and security could be improved."
"It would be better to integrate this infrastructure with native cloud environments, but we can't do it. We are trying to improve our experience by converting our infrastructure through virtualization on native cloud environments and workloads."
"There isn't a clear document covering all the errors. It would be helpful if the company provided better documentation for solving issues."
"Not very user friendly, too many configurations."
"The customer service and support are not as good as that of other solutions. It is not very fast."
More vCenter Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Clarity CA is ranked 3rd in Client Desktop Management with 2 reviews while vCenter Configuration Manager is ranked 10th in Configuration Management with 50 reviews. Clarity CA is rated 8.0, while vCenter Configuration Manager is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Clarity CA writes "Multipurpose and useful for managing projects and resources; easy to integrate with other systems, and has a knowledgeable technical support team". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCenter Configuration Manager writes "A solution with a range of functionalities and several pricing plans that suit your needs". Clarity CA is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, whereas vCenter Configuration Manager is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, Red Hat Satellite and BigFix.
We monitor all Client Desktop Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.