CA Clipper [EOL] vs FileMaker comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
views| comparisons
Apple Logo
211 views|78 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Its price is pretty reasonable. I am at a university. We get educational discount pricing from most of the major vendors."
  • More FileMaker Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Non-Relational Databases
    5th
    Views
    211
    Comparisons
    78
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Clipper
    Learn More
    Overview
    Information Not Available
    Cross-platform relational database application
    Sample Customers
    Blue Hill Data Services Inc.
    VUHL, Reynolds Services Inc., Market Refrigeration Specialists, Sea Breeze Farm, Jordan Lindblad, Henry Schein Dental

    CA Clipper [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Non-Relational Databases while FileMaker is ranked 5th in Non-Relational Databases. CA Clipper [EOL] is rated 0.0, while FileMaker is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of FileMaker writes "User-friendly, very stable, reasonable price, integrates well, and has all sorts of capabilities". CA Clipper [EOL] is most compared with , whereas FileMaker is most compared with FoxPro.

    See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

    We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.