• Home
  • CA Clipper [EOL] vs. IBM IMS

CA Clipper [EOL] vs IBM IMS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo

CA Clipper [EOL]

views| comparisons
IBM Logo

IBM IMS

100 views|96 comparisons
Ranking
Unranked
In Non-Relational Databases
7th
out of 19 in Non-Relational Databases
Views
100
Comparisons
96
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Clipper
IMS
Learn More
Broadcom
IBM
Overview
Information Not Available
Off-the-shelf warehouse management solution designed to help automate and streamline facility operations.
Sample Customers
Blue Hill Data Services Inc.
Nice Céte d'Azur, Ultra Petroleum, Hudson River HealthCare, SRG Global, The Poseidon Project, The City of Edinburgh Council, PotashCorp, ANZ, OTTO, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, NASCO, Apria Healthcare, Folksam
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm21%
Government13%
Manufacturing Company7%
Computer Software Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise76%

CA Clipper [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Non-Relational Databases while IBM IMS is ranked 7th in Non-Relational Databases. CA Clipper [EOL] is rated 0.0, while IBM IMS is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CA Clipper [EOL] is most compared with , whereas IBM IMS is most compared with CA IDMS and Adabas.

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.