Automic Continuous Delivery Automation vs Digital.ai Deploy comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery Automation and Digital.ai Deploy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Microsoft, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The IT process automation is the most valuable aspect of this solution.""The main benefit is you can deploy everything with it.""It gives us good feedback on visualizations and on how our processes have progressed.""We have saved on our time costs and have seen more quality.""You can design your workflows for your needs.""Gives people insight into what's happening during the deployment.""The event monitor is very good. You can monitor when the file is created so you can pick up the file once it's done.""I would say our headwind, or our time to market, is reduced considerably. We get more consistent results out of it, because you write one time and once it's automated you expect it to behave the same way every time. And it cut down a lot of re-work for us."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Pros →

"The solution's most valuable aspect is that it is vendor-agnostic and it has a file called Manifest, which makes it possible for developers, ops people, and system admins to cooperate.""The solution creates a manifest file that caps the bridge between the developer and the system admin.""This product is an innovative market leader in the field of application deployment."

More Digital.ai Deploy Pros →

Cons
"The stability of the solution can be improved.""One of the biggest features I've been asked by my team to put in there is opening more scripting languages to be part of the platform. There is a little bit of a learning curve in learning how to code some of the workflows in Automic at this time. If widely used languages like Perl and Python were integrated, on top of what's already there, the proprietary language, it would make it easier to on-board new resources.""key thing is support for cloud-based deployment. That is lacking.""Not a perfect ten because the user interface is brand new and it needs improvement.""If you have a technical problem and need development of the tool, the support team is terrible, because they cannot help with the technical details.""GUI for mobile phones: Availability to approve and start deployment through mobile phones.""The dashboard should allow you to see the current state of packages in each environment, not only on an individual application basis, but across the entire application platform.""We hope that we can integrate the new CD Directive into our portfolio, so we can bring the deployment and release management closer together."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Cons →

"While it is a flexible product and provides a means of integrating with virtually anything, the company should make a better effort to keep up with new platform integrations.""The solution currently has a bug that causes performance issues. They need to resolve this in a future release.""The tool needs to improve on cloud-native GitOps."

More Digital.ai Deploy Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We increased our quality and reduced our time costs."
  • "I can save time and money more quickly."
  • "If you have a fixed contract, it has limits to spreading out. If you have a flexible enterprise license contract, then you have a lot of scalability for this tool."
  • "Customers often complain about the price."
  • More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing costs are based on annual subscriptions."
  • "The product’s pricing is acceptable. We get volume discounts."
  • More Digital.ai Deploy Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The solution creates a manifest file that caps the bridge between the developer and the system admin.
    Top Answer:The product’s pricing is acceptable. We get volume discounts.
    Top Answer:The tool needs to improve on cloud-native GitOps.
    Ranking
    17th
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    388
    Comparisons
    316
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    15th
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    585
    Comparisons
    344
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    197
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform
    Deployit, XLDeploy, XebiaLabs XL Deploy
    Learn More
    Overview

    Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar. 

    Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

    Automate and standardize complex, enterprise-scale application deployments to any environment—from mainframes and middleware to containers and the cloud. Speed up deployments with increased reliability. Enable self-service deployment while maintaining governance and control.

    Sample Customers
    BET365, Charter Communications, TASC
    American Express, Xerox, Fandango, Rabobank, Cable & Wireless, Air France, 3M, GE, Liberty Mutual, EA
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm36%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    Transportation Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm37%
    Insurance Company12%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise79%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business73%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise18%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise81%
    Buyer's Guide
    Release Automation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Microsoft, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is ranked 17th in Release Automation while Digital.ai Deploy is ranked 15th in Release Automation with 11 reviews. Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is rated 8.0, while Digital.ai Deploy is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Automic Continuous Delivery Automation writes "Reduces our time to market considerably with automated and consistent results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Digital.ai Deploy writes "Besides for the flash GUI which is a pain, it includes all of the features we were looking for". Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is most compared with UrbanCode Deploy, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Nolio Release Automation and Qentelli, whereas Digital.ai Deploy is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, GitLab and Digital.ai Release .

    See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.