Compare CA Continuous Delivery Automation vs. XebiaLabs XL Deploy

CA Continuous Delivery Automation is ranked 4th in Release Automation with 10 reviews while XebiaLabs XL Deploy is ranked 5th in Release Automation with 2 reviews. CA Continuous Delivery Automation is rated 8.2, while XebiaLabs XL Deploy is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CA Continuous Delivery Automation writes "Reduces our time to market considerably with automated and consistent results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of XebiaLabs XL Deploy writes "This intelligent deployment tool can accelerate and scale deployment automation ". CA Continuous Delivery Automation is most compared with Ansible, CA Release Automation and Control-M, whereas XebiaLabs XL Deploy is most compared with UrbanCode Deploy, Ansible and Microsoft Azure DevOps.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Microsoft, Chef and others in Release Automation. Updated: November 2019.
378,397 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The event monitor is very good. You can monitor when the file is created so you can pick up the file once it's done.It is an umbrella system that allows us to integrate many different systems into our heterogeneous environment.The main benefit is you can deploy everything with it.It can support very complex environments and dependencies.It gives us good feedback on visualizations and on how our processes have progressed.The most valuable feature is the ability to see which problems have been resolved from deployment.The product provides efficiency, in terms time, cost, and resources.It provides a wonderful user interface which is easy to use.

Read more »

The solution's most valuable aspect is that it is vendor-agnostic and it has a file called Manifest, which makes it possible for developers, ops people, and system admins to cooperate.This product is an innovative market leader in the field of application deployment.

Read more »

Cons
There needs to be better error handling and error descriptions. It should be more clear what the errors are and what we can do to fix them.It would be very beneficial for us to see integrations into cloud environments, especially into the Google Cloud environment because we are heading towards cloud.There is an issue with the stability in the tool. The process of agent will stop, then the monitoring agent can't be recognized because the process is running, but you can talk with the system.If you have a technical problem and need development of the tool, the support team is terrible, because they cannot help with the technical details.At the moment, the version that we are using (version 12.0), the environment is complex with multiple installations. Therefore, the monitoring is not scalable, but this should be improved in 12.1 and 12.2.We hope that we can integrate the new CD Directive into our portfolio, so we can bring the deployment and release management closer together.The dashboard should allow you to see the current state of packages in each environment, not only on an individual application basis, but across the entire application platform.One of the biggest features I've been asked by my team to put in there is opening more scripting languages to be part of the platform. There is a little bit of a learning curve in learning how to code some of the workflows in Automic at this time. If widely used languages like Perl and Python were integrated, on top of what's already there, the proprietary language, it would make it easier to on-board new resources.

Read more »

The solution currently has a bug that causes performance issues. They need to resolve this in a future release.While it is a flexible product and provides a means of integrating with virtually anything, the company should make a better effort to keep up with new platform integrations.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
If you have a fixed contract, it has limits to spreading out. If you have a flexible enterprise license contract, then you have a lot of scalability for this tool.I can save time and money more quickly.We increased our quality and reduced our time costs.

Read more »

Pricing costs are based on annual subscriptions.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
378,397 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
out of 28 in Release Automation
Views
3,472
Comparisons
1,825
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
524
Avg. Rating
8.3
5th
out of 28 in Release Automation
Views
4,662
Comparisons
2,391
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
2,129
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Also Known As
Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation PlatformDeployit, XLDeploy
Learn
CA (A Broadcom Company)
XebiaLabs
Overview

Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar. 

Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

XebiaLabs is a leading provider of delivery automation software that helps organizations deliver business value faster and more efficiently. Headquartered in the U.S., XebiaLabs has a world-wide network of sales offices and partners.

Offer
Learn more about CA Continuous Delivery Automation
Learn more about XebiaLabs XL Deploy
Sample Customers
BET365, Charter Communications, TASCAmerican Express, Xerox, Fandango, Rabobank, Cable & Wireless, Air France, 3M, GE, Liberty Mutual, EA
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm50%
Retailer25%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
Transportation Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Marketing Services Firm28%
Comms Service Provider17%
Software R&D Company13%
Financial Services Firm11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company43%
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider10%
Insurance Company4%
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Microsoft, Chef and others in Release Automation. Updated: November 2019.
378,397 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email