• Home
  • Automic Continuous Delivery Director vs. SAS rPath [EOL]

Automic Continuous Delivery Director vs SAS rPath [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery Director and SAS rPath [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Umair (Abu Mohaymin) Akhlaque
An automation solution to automate the entire release process but lacks development
Automic eliminates a lot of error mishandling. If implemented, it can save a significant amount of money. It requires a substantial investment... Read more →
Anonymous User
Be sure of what you want before implementation as it can be costly to correct a mistake.
I Integrated rBuilder with Jenkins and setup a Continuous Deployment
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is a free trial available that people can try. The solution has a subscription and it is based on the users that use the solution."

    • More Automic Continuous Delivery Director Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Automic Continuous Delivery Director?
    Top Answer:Its extensive range of available connectors eliminates the need for manual code writing when implementing solutions, thus reducing coding efforts.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Automic Continuou...
    Top Answer:The product has easy licensing, which depends on the number being installed.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Automic Continuous Delivery Director?
    Top Answer:The product's development has been stopped. It focuses on maintaining existing products.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    15th
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    138
    Comparisons
    55
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    465
    Rating
    7.5
    Unranked
    In Release Automation
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA CDD, CA Continuous Delivery Director
    rPath
    Learn More
    Broadcom
    SAS
    Overview

    CA Continuous Delivery Director is a powerful pipeline planning, orchestration and analytics solution that enables teams to eliminate spreadsheets, automate test processes and continually improve the delivery of revenue-generating features to end customers. The solution works with the most popular commercial and open source DevOps solutions to orchestrate the pipeline from planning through production. It is also the core of the continuous delivery ecosystem from CA, which includes development, testing and deployment solutions. CA Continuous Delivery Director enables effortless continuous delivery of high-quality, innovative applications from high-performance, collaborative teams.

    rPath is specialized in automating the assembly, provisioning and updating of diverse operating systems and middleware platforms and application stacks throughout enterprises.
    Sample Customers
    United Airlines
    Kaiser Permanente, Local Government Federal Credit Union, Los Angeles County DPSS, Lotte.com Nantes University Hospital Center, National Bank of Greece, National Board of Social Services
    Buyer's Guide
    Release Automation
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Automic Continuous Delivery Director is ranked 15th in Release Automation with 5 reviews while SAS rPath [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Release Automation. Automic Continuous Delivery Director is rated 8.0, while SAS rPath [EOL] is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of Automic Continuous Delivery Director writes "An automation solution to automate the entire release process but lacks development". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS rPath [EOL] writes "Be sure of what you want before implementation as it can be costly to correct a mistake". Automic Continuous Delivery Director is most compared with , whereas SAS rPath [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.