We performed a comparison between Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."The technical support and documentation are quite good."
More Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Pros →
"I really like the user interface and how it works."
"We can present to our management in real time the security of the batch management for the PCs, security regarding the network equipment. We're currently working in the Azure Cloud project, so we can send any logs from the cloud to Splunk. We can monitor them and we can present to the managers and customers. It's a very good solution for reporting. We use Splunk for reporting and monitoring of any solution in the company."
"The solution has made us more secure."
"It is a one stop shop as a full monitoring and alerting solution for operations and application analysis for most of our back-end systems."
"It is very simple to tweak or write a small piece of glue code to go ahead and create a new dashboard for a business unit to make near real-time decisions to focus more on other geographies when launching the product."
"The most valuable features of Splunk Enterprise Security are its high-performance data collection, flexible query language, and its versatility across the organization."
"You can integrate Splunk with third-party security automation solutions and set rules for automatic response."
"The product provides visibility and enables us to correlate data and generate alerts."
"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."
More Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Cons →
"I would like to see future development in terms of ML (Machine Learning)."
"It takes time to train people."
"Splunk could improve its default machine-learning models. Also, Splunk Enterprise's native threat intelligence isn't that good. I prefer a custom threat intelligence model."
"Splunk could enhance its services by providing more comprehensive professional assistance aimed at optimizing our investment."
"DMC should be a little more intuitive with better dashboarding. Seeing the cause of data flow can be tough to track down."
"Splunk can be an expensive solution. Technical support could be improved as well."
"AngularJS/ReactJS inclusion could be made easier in GUI."
"Certain sections of the developer documentation could use some updating and clarification."
Earn 20 points
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is ranked 104th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 2nd in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 228 reviews. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is rated 6.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management writes "Good technical support and scales well for cloud deployments but needs better UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is most compared with , whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel and Elastic Security.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
