CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS vs IBM InfoSphere Optim comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS and IBM InfoSphere Optim based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Quest Software, SolarWinds and others in Database Development and Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Database Development and Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"​It helps us to reduce hardware costs and to optimize processing times.​""The most important features are batch reporting and the ability to create repositories, enabling automated analysis. These are valuable because they enable me to do automated analysis of trends over time and reduce the time for comparing performance between two periods to identify anomalies.""It takes advantage of new features of DB2.""​It is very stable. We have had no issues.""Improved monitoring and performance management."

More CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS Pros →

"I feel the solution to be a bit faster than the traditional methods, which makes it easy to customize.""We like that we can easily restore the database with just a few clicks. The database is linked as well."

More IBM InfoSphere Optim Pros →

Cons
"All the information we need, we could use to have it in a more usable format.​""Minor stability issues.""They need to provide a way to create and maintain performance repositories. The online tool is not perfect, but it is giving me what I need."

More CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS Cons →

"While the solution is very supportive of Db2, it is not so friendly when it comes to IMS databases.""We're looking for a solution that can be implemented on AWS. IBM InfoSphere Optim can be implemented on AWS, but it costs more than double what we're currently paying. So, it's not really of good value for us."

More IBM InfoSphere Optim Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "IBM InfoSphere Optim is a very expensive solution. Actually, it's the most expensive archiving solution that we have."
  • More IBM InfoSphere Optim Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:We like that we can easily restore the database with just a few clicks. The database is linked as well.
    Top Answer:IBM InfoSphere Optim is a very expensive solution. Actually, it's the most expensive archiving solution that we have. The cost is per license and per gigabytes.
    Top Answer:The cost needs to be reduced. It is a very expensive solution. We're looking for a solution that can be implemented on AWS. IBM InfoSphere Optim can be implemented on AWS, but it costs more than… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    246
    Comparisons
    144
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    849
    Comparisons
    296
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    489
    Rating
    6.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA Database Management Solutions for DB2 for z/OS
    IBM Optim, Optim
    Learn More
    Overview
    Database Management for DB2 for z/OS solutions from CA Technologies provide a set of tools designed to ensure optimal database and SQL performance, efficient administration, and reliable backup and recovery of DB2 databases, systems and apps.
    IBM Optim solutions manage data from requirements to retirement. They boost performance, empower collaboration, and improve governance across applications, databases and platforms. By managing data properly over its lifetime, organisations are better equipped to support business goals with less risk.
    Sample Customers
    Blue Hill Data Services
    Durham Police Department, Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc., Continental, KCE Electronics Public Company Limited, The University of Adelaide, Migros Zurich, COPROB
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm44%
    Insurance Company33%
    Local Government22%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Insurance Company10%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise73%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise78%
    Buyer's Guide
    Database Development and Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Quest Software, SolarWinds and others in Database Development and Management. Updated: April 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS is ranked 30th in Database Development and Management while IBM InfoSphere Optim is ranked 17th in Database Development and Management with 3 reviews. CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS is rated 8.8, while IBM InfoSphere Optim is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS writes "The most useful feature is the ability to create strategies across the products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere Optim writes "Can easily restore the database, but the cost needs to be reduced". CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS is most compared with CA IDMS and CA Datacom, whereas IBM InfoSphere Optim is most compared with Solix Enterprise Data Management, Informatica Data Archive, Informatica Persistent Data Masking and Oracle Enterprise Manager.

    See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.

    We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.