Compare CA Dynamic Capacity Intelligence vs. Rocket Software Mainframe

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
18th
Views
20
Comparisons
6
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
5th
Views
765
Comparisons
288
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Rocket Mainstar, Rocket Data, Rocket AS, Rocket OpenTech, Rocket BlueZone/Passport Terminal Emulation
Learn More
Overview

Capacity management that empowers IT to better manage service level agreements through automated dynamic capacity optimization.

With solutions focused on data management, performance optimization, catalog and system management, disaster recovery, storage management and security, the largest companies in the world rely on Rocket mainframe solutions to support their payroll processing, timely healthcare diagnoses, banking transactions, mutual fund deposits, flight reservations, billing transactions and more.

Offer
Learn more about CA Dynamic Capacity Intelligence
Learn more about Rocket Software Mainframe
Sample Customers
Irdeto, Novapost, Vodafone Turkey
KKH Statutory Health Insurance Fund
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Financial Services Firm13%
Government9%
Educational Organization7%

CA Dynamic Capacity Intelligence is ranked 18th in Mainframe Management while Rocket Software Mainframe is ranked 5th in Mainframe Management. CA Dynamic Capacity Intelligence is rated 0.0, while Rocket Software Mainframe is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CA Dynamic Capacity Intelligence is most compared with , whereas Rocket Software Mainframe is most compared with IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON, ASG TMON, BMC MainView and Precisely MFX.

See our list of best Mainframe Management vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.