CA Unicenter NSM [EOL] vs CA eHealth [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
views| comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
views| comparisons
33% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA eHealth [EOL] and CA Unicenter NSM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications.
To learn more, read our detailed Network Management Applications Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Ranking
Unranked
In Network Management Applications
Unranked
In Network Management Applications
Buyer's Guide
Network Management Applications
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA eHealth Performance Manager
Learn More
Overview
eHealth collects and analyzes key performance information (KPI) across your IT infrastructure to provide real-time and predictive performance analysis. This information can guide your staff toward the corrective actions needed to avoid negative impacts on business processes.
Information Not Available
Sample Customers
BlueCross Blue Shield of Tennessee, Devoteam, Fujitsu Australia and New Zealand , National Informatics Centre, Uttar Pradesh State Unit Lucknow, Punjab National Bank, Racing and Wagering Western Australia, Sicredi
BBVA Compass, BlueCross Blue Shield of Tennessee, Empowered Networks, Hill International, Sicredi
Buyer's Guide
Network Management Applications
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA eHealth [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Management Applications while CA Unicenter NSM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Management Applications. CA eHealth [EOL] is rated 7.4, while CA Unicenter NSM [EOL] is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of CA eHealth [EOL] writes "It has a lot of data on a stable platform. It only has a few canned out-of-the-box reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CA Unicenter NSM [EOL] writes "Error log monitoring for applications is valuable to us. A few ports did not open correctly during the installation". CA eHealth [EOL] is most compared with NetMaster Network Intelligence, whereas CA Unicenter NSM [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.

We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.