CA eHealth [EOL] vs Cloudkick [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
views| comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Rackspace Logo
views| comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA eHealth [EOL] and Cloudkick [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Ranking
Unranked
In IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Unranked
In IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA eHealth Performance Manager
Learn More
Overview
eHealth collects and analyzes key performance information (KPI) across your IT infrastructure to provide real-time and predictive performance analysis. This information can guide your staff toward the corrective actions needed to avoid negative impacts on business processes.
Simple, powerful tools to manage cloud servers and revolutionize the way companies manage their IT infrastructure.
Sample Customers
BlueCross Blue Shield of Tennessee, Devoteam, Fujitsu Australia and New Zealand , National Informatics Centre, Uttar Pradesh State Unit Lucknow, Punjab National Bank, Racing and Wagering Western Australia, Sicredi
ScaleXtreme, CloudMine, infoplum, simPRO
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA eHealth [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while Cloudkick [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. CA eHealth [EOL] is rated 7.4, while Cloudkick [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CA eHealth [EOL] writes "It has a lot of data on a stable platform. It only has a few canned out-of-the-box reports". On the other hand, CA eHealth [EOL] is most compared with NetMaster Network Intelligence, whereas Cloudkick [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.