We performed a comparison between CA eHealth [EOL] and Datadog based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."The most valuable feature of this solution is the fact that it sends me canned reports. It's easy to use and easy to update."
"The solution has helped out organization gain improved visibility."
"The most valuable features are logging, the extensive set of integrations, and easy jumpstart."
"We've been able to glean from the monitors what servers are down, and can alert the team in Slack."
"APM and tracing are super useful."
"The observability pipelines are the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"The application performance monitoring is pretty good."
"It has scaled great. I haven't run into any problems anywhere that I've used it. They have handled everything that we have needed them to."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the APM."
"I would like to see improved index shifting."
"When I started using it years ago, it had stability problems. I remember, specifically, we ran everything in Docker containers. There were some problems getting it into a Docker container with very specific memory limits."
"If there were a more cost-effective manner of deploying the tool, we'd be more likely to adopt it more widely."
"It could probably be a little bit of a better user experience."
"We would like to see some versioning system for the Synthetic Tests so that we could have a backup of our tests since they are time-consuming to make and very easy to damage in a moment of error."
"Datadog has a lot of documentation, but a lot of that documentation assumes you know how the service works, which can lead to confusion."
"The menu on the left is pretty dense (and I know it has to be). I never knew about the cmd+k functionality until recently. It would be helpful to offer more tips/cheat sheets to see handy shortcuts like that."
"I'm not sure what kind of features are in the roadmap right now, but I encourage the development of features for defining your organization, and allowing the visibility of what kind of metrics you can get. Those features would be really useful for us."
"I've found that the documentation is lacking in certain regards."
Earn 20 points
CA eHealth [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while Datadog is ranked 2nd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 137 reviews. CA eHealth [EOL] is rated 7.4, while Datadog is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CA eHealth [EOL] writes "It has a lot of data on a stable platform. It only has a few canned out-of-the-box reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". CA eHealth [EOL] is most compared with NetMaster Network Intelligence, whereas Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and AppDynamics.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.