CA eHealth [EOL] vs HPE Intelligent Management Center comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
views| comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
1,815 views|1,282 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA eHealth [EOL] and HPE Intelligent Management Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications.
To learn more, read our detailed Network Management Applications Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the fact that it sends me canned reports. It's easy to use and easy to update."

More CA eHealth [EOL] Pros →

"The most useful feature is infrastructure monitoring including switches and servers.""It's a very complete product with a lot of functionality.""The most valuable feature is the interface and its ease of use.""One of the notable advantages is its ability to provide quick responses, especially in critical situations."

More HPE Intelligent Management Center Pros →

Cons
"I would like to see improved index shifting."

More CA eHealth [EOL] Cons →

"I would like to see additional modules included.""HPE Intelligent Management Center is a bit slow.""The integration with other network devices needs improvement.""One notable deficiency is the lack of online support for the product."

More HPE Intelligent Management Center Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There are licensing costs and they are quite expensive."
  • "The price of this solution is not at all cheap, but it's reasonable compared to SolarWinds."
  • More HPE Intelligent Management Center Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Management Applications solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:One of the notable advantages is its ability to provide quick responses, especially in critical situations.
    Top Answer:Despite its effectiveness in managing numerous switches and network equipment, it lacks diversity in models. It comes across as rather simplistic without additional modules, and while they have… more »
    Top Answer:I use it to oversee the administration of switches within our network infrastructure. The platform allows me to manage users efficiently, perform equipment backups, and generate reports.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Network Management Applications
    Views
    1,815
    Comparisons
    1,282
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    427
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA eHealth Performance Manager
    HPE IMC
    Learn More
    Overview
    eHealth collects and analyzes key performance information (KPI) across your IT infrastructure to provide real-time and predictive performance analysis. This information can guide your staff toward the corrective actions needed to avoid negative impacts on business processes.

    HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) is a comprehensive management platform that was built from the ground up to support the Fault, Configuration, Accounting, Performance, Security (FCAPS) model. It provides features and functions that are designed for comprehensive management of the network infrastructure. IMC was designed to provide the following functions:

    • Supports the ITIL operational center of excellence IT practices model.
    • Uses a single-pane management paradigm to enable end-to-end business management of IT services
    • Provides scalability by supporting distributed and hierarchical system architectures, through additional operating system and database support.
    • Uses an SOA model to provide full resource, service, and user management.
    • Enables integration of traditionally separate management tools using a modular design.
    • Enables enterprises to expand their infrastructure management in scale and to seamlessly accommodate new technologies at the same time.
    Sample Customers
    BlueCross Blue Shield of Tennessee, Devoteam, Fujitsu Australia and New Zealand , National Informatics Centre, Uttar Pradesh State Unit Lucknow, Punjab National Bank, Racing and Wagering Western Australia, Sicredi
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Government13%
    Educational Organization7%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Management Applications
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA eHealth [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Management Applications while HPE Intelligent Management Center is ranked 7th in Network Management Applications with 6 reviews. CA eHealth [EOL] is rated 7.4, while HPE Intelligent Management Center is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of CA eHealth [EOL] writes "It has a lot of data on a stable platform. It only has a few canned out-of-the-box reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Intelligent Management Center writes "Efficient network management providing fast response times, user-friendly navigation and reliable performance monitoring". CA eHealth [EOL] is most compared with NetMaster Network Intelligence, whereas HPE Intelligent Management Center is most compared with Aruba Airwave, Cisco DNA Center, Cisco Prime, Huawei eSight and SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager.

    See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.

    We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.