We performed a comparison between CA eHealth [EOL] and HPE OneView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."The most valuable feature of this solution is the fact that it sends me canned reports. It's easy to use and easy to update."
"Have a single plane of glass across all of the server platforms."
"The most valuable features are the composable structure, infrastructure, and automation."
"Easy to add servers and get them monitored and manageable."
"The solution's initial setup process was easy...The technical support is good...It is a stable product, and we will use it for a long time."
"It's rather simple to use, and that's very important for us."
"OneView provides a single console, which is manageable without physical access."
"We could literally swap out a piece of hardware, slide one back into the chassis, and immediately - about three reboots later - it was identical. We didn't have to worry about configuring it, we didn't have to spend any time getting anything into place. It came back and it healed the environment almost immediately."
"Easy to see if all my servers are on correct firmware levels, with SPP packaging."
"I would like to see improved index shifting."
"It needs more reporting capabilities."
"The speed and performance of the solution are areas where the product lacks and needs improvement."
"We ran into a couple of issues here and there with the baselines for the firmware and not having enough space on the appliance itself to be able to have more than two baselines."
"We've had a few issues. We just upgraded to the 3.9.0 version. We think that now that we are on that version, hopefully a lot of those things are going to go away for us."
"It would be better if we can add every HPE device to OneView, such as MSA, as well as the other servers like the DL server and ML server."
"The interface is a bit bland. It does its job, but it could have a better interface."
"I had some minor difficulties with upgrading, but the solution still works fine."
"Use it, but do not think it is going into the clouds, because it is not. There is room for improvement."
Earn 20 points
CA eHealth [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while HPE OneView is ranked 17th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 80 reviews. CA eHealth [EOL] is rated 7.4, while HPE OneView is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CA eHealth [EOL] writes "It has a lot of data on a stable platform. It only has a few canned out-of-the-box reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE OneView writes "Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO". CA eHealth [EOL] is most compared with NetMaster Network Intelligence, whereas HPE OneView is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Dell CloudIQ, Zabbix, SolarWinds NPM and Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
