CA eHealth [EOL] vs ManageEngine Network Configuration Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA eHealth [EOL] and ManageEngine Network Configuration Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications.
To learn more, read our detailed Network Management Applications Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Ranking
Unranked
In Network Management Applications
24th
Views
194
Comparisons
160
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Network Management Applications
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications. Updated: March 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA eHealth Performance Manager
ManageEngine NCM
Learn More
Overview
eHealth collects and analyzes key performance information (KPI) across your IT infrastructure to provide real-time and predictive performance analysis. This information can guide your staff toward the corrective actions needed to avoid negative impacts on business processes.

Network configurations are in a constant flux and any wrong or unauthorized configuration change on live equipment can have profound effects on network security, reliability and the service provided.

Take control of your network configurations and simplify change management.

OpManager's Network Configuration Management helps you automate policy–based change, configuration and compliance on your network devices, making manual configuration errors a thing of the past. 

Sample Customers
BlueCross Blue Shield of Tennessee, Devoteam, Fujitsu Australia and New Zealand , National Informatics Centre, Uttar Pradesh State Unit Lucknow, Punjab National Bank, Racing and Wagering Western Australia, Sicredi
Lightyear Network Solutions, Princeton University, Bovertis B.V
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company13%
Government10%
Comms Service Provider9%
Educational Organization8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise58%
Buyer's Guide
Network Management Applications
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications. Updated: March 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA eHealth [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Management Applications while ManageEngine Network Configuration Management is ranked 24th in Configuration Management. CA eHealth [EOL] is rated 7.4, while ManageEngine Network Configuration Management is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CA eHealth [EOL] writes "It has a lot of data on a stable platform. It only has a few canned out-of-the-box reports". On the other hand, CA eHealth [EOL] is most compared with NetMaster Network Intelligence, whereas ManageEngine Network Configuration Management is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Cisco Prime and Huawei eSight.

We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.