We performed a comparison between CA eHealth [EOL] and Scout APM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications."The most valuable feature of this solution is the fact that it sends me canned reports. It's easy to use and easy to update."
"The product can scale."
"I would like to see improved index shifting."
"I can't recall coming across any missing features."
Earn 20 points
CA eHealth [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Management Applications while Scout APM is ranked 30th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 1 review. CA eHealth [EOL] is rated 7.4, while Scout APM is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of CA eHealth [EOL] writes "It has a lot of data on a stable platform. It only has a few canned out-of-the-box reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Scout APM writes "Great visibility and reliability with fair pricing". CA eHealth [EOL] is most compared with NetMaster Network Intelligence, whereas Scout APM is most compared with Zabbix, Datadog, Prometheus, Grafana and New Relic.
We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.