CA eHealth [EOL] vs Tintri Global Center [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA eHealth [EOL] and Tintri Global Center [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the fact that it sends me canned reports. It's easy to use and easy to update."

More CA eHealth [EOL] Pros →

"The Tintri product line as a whole has freed up a lot of resources from constant administration of legacy enterprise storage."

More Tintri Global Center [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"I would like to see improved index shifting."

More CA eHealth [EOL] Cons →

"A better Tintri would be a "cheaper" one to get things started again."

More Tintri Global Center [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Ranking
Unranked
In IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Unranked
In IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA eHealth Performance Manager
Learn More
Overview
eHealth collects and analyzes key performance information (KPI) across your IT infrastructure to provide real-time and predictive performance analysis. This information can guide your staff toward the corrective actions needed to avoid negative impacts on business processes.

Tintri Global Center (TGC) controls each of your applications automatically. Set policies for quality of service, cloning, snapshots and replication: all at the application level. Plus, Tintri treats up to 64 Tintri systems as a federated pool of storage that you can manage in just minutes per day.

Sample Customers
BlueCross Blue Shield of Tennessee, Devoteam, Fujitsu Australia and New Zealand , National Informatics Centre, Uttar Pradesh State Unit Lucknow, Punjab National Bank, Racing and Wagering Western Australia, Sicredi
That’s why leading enterprises including Comcast, Chevron, NASA, Toyota, United Healthcare and 20% of the Fortune 100, trust Tintri with storage needs.
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA eHealth [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while Tintri Global Center [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. CA eHealth [EOL] is rated 7.4, while Tintri Global Center [EOL] is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of CA eHealth [EOL] writes "It has a lot of data on a stable platform. It only has a few canned out-of-the-box reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tintri Global Center [EOL] writes "Provides VM protection with scheduled snapshots and replication". CA eHealth [EOL] is most compared with NetMaster Network Intelligence, whereas Tintri Global Center [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.