CA SQL-Ease vs Gen comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
34 views|15 comparisons
Broadcom Logo
296 views|94 comparisons
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
34
Comparisons
15
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
296
Comparisons
94
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA SQL-Ease for Db2 for z/OS
CA Gen
Learn More
Overview

CA SQL-Ease for Db2 for z/OS simplifies the development process by allowing you to ensure you have clean, efficient SQL before releasing an application into a test or production environment.

CA Gen provides a single, integrated development environment that can help your teams create and maintain large-scale business applications for multiple platforms. This streamlined environment can help reduce manual labor and speed migration time while ensuring the future relevance of existing environments and applications.
Sample Customers
Hanwha, Sandvik, Vodafone Turkey, Sky
Global bank
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Financial Services Firm14%
Manufacturing Company14%
Government10%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise78%

CA SQL-Ease is ranked 13th in Mainframe Application Development while Gen is ranked 4th in Mainframe Application Development. CA SQL-Ease is rated 0.0, while Gen is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Gen writes "Rapid development software tool. Mature solution to make changes and put them in production". CA SQL-Ease is most compared with , whereas Gen is most compared with IBM Rational Developer for z Systems.

See our list of best Mainframe Application Development vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Application Development reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.