We performed a comparison between CA Harvest Software Change Manager and Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, BMC, Microsoft and others in Software Configuration Management."Using this solution, we were able to implement a full process for all of our lifecycles."
"The ability to give our teams functionality from a control perspective, allowing them to decide how they want to implement the tool, is valuable."
"We have now automatic and immediate control of assets usage, and we can now better manage our assets pool and get benefits through that."
"It is stable and scalable."
"This product can be customized according to the needs of any company."
"Security features can be improved."
"Technical support for this solution is very good, although they can still use improvement in some regards."
"Password complexity is not enforced by the tool."
"The technology used is outdated, the interface is outdated, the database is outdated, everything is outdated."
"The usability of this product is still out-of-date and could be improved. The interface could be improved."
"There are a lot of things that need improvement. Software recognition, software licensing, software compliance, data inputs, reporting, and support are some of the areas."
More CA Harvest Software Change Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
CA Harvest Software Change Manager is ranked 8th in Software Configuration Management while Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Software Configuration Management. CA Harvest Software Change Manager is rated 7.2, while Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of CA Harvest Software Change Manager writes "Powerful UDP functionality with a user-friendly interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] writes "A stable and clever solution, but it is very complex and it needs a lot of improvements". CA Harvest Software Change Manager is most compared with Endevor, whereas Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is most compared with .
We monitor all Software Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
