We performed a comparison between RSA SecurID Access and Symantec Identity Governance and Administration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems."I would say that the two-factor authentication and the ease of installation and configuration are the most valuable features of this solution."
"One of the most valuable feature is the ID soft token and hard token."
"The most valuable features of RSA SecurID Access are push notifications, multifactor authentication, and ease of integration and deployment."
"It is a scalable solution."
"I think it is really good when it comes to the hard token side of things."
"Using the implementation guide, I was able to implement the solution with ease."
"The scalability potential is there if a company needs to expand."
"Self-registration and self-service password management are valuable features. The role modeling feature is also very useful. It allows you to model your enterprise role."
"There are many valuable features within the solution. The product is easy to customize. It’s also highly secure."
"Governance."
"Connector Xpress and Policy Xpress and the new interface."
"Streamlines user access, consolidates applications."
"It's a very useful tool that has improved our client's security, from day one."
"There are different compliances across the globe; RSA SecurID Access could be more complaint-based."
"Sometimes, we encounter issues with other applications that are not compatible with RSA SecurID Access and require expert troubleshooting. At those times, we need additional support from an implementation perspective. This is an area where Oracle can improve as there is no substitute for reliable and efficient support."
"It doesn't offer an agent-based or reverse-proxy-based approach to integration, which could enhance its flexibility."
"The interface needs to improve a lot. It should be easier to manage and navigate."
"Symantec is only on-premises, not on the cloud."
"It has a large footprint which you'd expect to be much, much smaller. Just to run basic services, we have 10 different servers. Also, if it were easier to manage, that'd be useful."
"The support from Symantec Identity Governance and Administration could improve."
"The solution is not the best or the fastest available."
"The product's technical support could be better."
"A better information display for the approvals within the workflow would give them more information and the ability to comment back on a request as to why they're rejecting it. We've been telling them we'd like this improvement, and we hope to see it."
"There are times that it takes too long to generate reports and to run the assessment tools to collect the information."
"The reporting functions."
More Symantec Identity Governance and Administration Pricing and Cost Advice →
RSA SecurID Access is ranked 8th in Authentication Systems with 9 reviews while Symantec Identity Governance and Administration is ranked 19th in Identity Management (IM) with 65 reviews. RSA SecurID Access is rated 7.8, while Symantec Identity Governance and Administration is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of RSA SecurID Access writes "Enhanced security, reliable, helpful technical support, and easy to install". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Identity Governance and Administration writes "Works well on-premises and has partial capabilities but lacks many feaures". RSA SecurID Access is most compared with Yubico YubiKey, Microsoft Entra ID, PingID, Fortinet FortiToken and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), whereas Symantec Identity Governance and Administration is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, AlertEnterprise Enterprise Guardian, SAP Identity Management, Microsoft Identity Manager and BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.