CA Identity Suite [EOL] vs RSA SecurID comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Omada Logo
3,626 views|1,582 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
views| comparisons
90% willing to recommend
RSA Logo
4,766 views|4,182 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Identity Suite [EOL] and RSA SecurID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SailPoint, One Identity and others in Identity Management (IM).
To learn more, read our detailed Identity Management (IM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has a very user-friendly interface compared to what we are used to, and it is highly configurable. In the old solution, when we needed to do something, we had to have a programmer sitting next to us, whereas, in Omada Identity, everything is configurable.""The most valuable feature for us is the ability to set up connectors to various IT systems and offer a wide range of supported connectors.""We used to have a problem where an employee's access wasn't terminated when they left the company. Now, we have much better visibility into and control over who has access.""For me, the best feature of Omada Identity is its web interface because it's really easy for users to understand.""Its best feature is definitely the process design. It is quite easy and straightforward to design a process.""The most valuable feature of Omada is its API connectivity, which allows seamless integration with various services like SAP, GRC, and Microsoft licenses.""You can make resources. You can import them from Azure or Active Directory and put them in an application. For example, if there is an application that uses a lot of Active Directory groups, you can make the groups available for people. If they need to access that application, you can tell them the resource groups you have for that application. People can do everything by themselves. They do not need anybody else. They can just go to the Omada portal, and they can do it all by themselves. That is terrific.""The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology."

More Omada Identity Pros →

"I found all of them quite valuable, especially the identity manager, governance, and identity portal. All the features are helpful.""The most valuable feature is the re-certification campaign capabilities.""With the Virtual Appliance, combined with CA Identity Manager and GovernanceMinder as one solution, it eliminates having multiple infrastructure requirements, multiple products, and gives a holistic view of the access granting.""The most valuable feature is the speed of implementation. Now with the Virtual Appliance, it's much faster. In the past, to implement this kind of solution, it would take so many weeks. Now, it takes one day, or minutes, and we have the deployment ready.""You can spin up IDM or Identity Suite in a few hours and it is ready to use.""Nowadays it is offered as a Virtual Appliance, and that saves considerable time for installing and controlling it."

More CA Identity Suite [EOL] Pros →

"I would say that the two-factor authentication and the ease of installation and configuration are the most valuable features of this solution.""One of the most valuable feature is the ID soft token and hard token.""I think it is really good when it comes to the hard token side of things.""It is a scalable solution.""The most valuable features of RSA SecurID Access are push notifications, multifactor authentication, and ease of integration and deployment."

More RSA SecurID Pros →

Cons
"The security permission inside Omada needs improvement. It's tricky to set up.""The reporting and importing have room for improvement.""The backend is pretty good but the self-service request access screen, the GUI, needs improvement. It's an old-fashioned screen. Also, Omada has reports, but I wouldn't dare show them to the business because they look like they're from 1995. I know they are working on these things and that’s good, because they’re really needed.""Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is common for most of the products we evaluated. Its scalability should be better. It had a few scalability issues.""They need to improve the cost for small companies.""If you're running Omada on a cloud service, you may have some issues deploying the newest release. Sometimes, the latest release doesn't adapt to the processes we have already installed. Identity Access Management is a critical system for our organization, and we need to ensure that everyone has the same access as they did before the release.""When making a process, you should be able to use some coding to do some advanced calculations. The calculations you can currently do are too basic. I would also like some additional script features.""When the re-certification process is launched that makes Omada very slow. There are performance issues in the current version."

More Omada Identity Cons →

"The connectors for the identity and governance part could use some improvement, by way of adding more areas. They need more development to cover more target applications.""I would like synchronization when a mapping is added between end points. Currently, the synchronization is not complete. It would be great if this synchronization happened immediately.""The documentation can be improved because sometimes we have some technical issues that were not documented and we have to rely on support to solve them. Then there are issues around getting the architecture, but it's challenging to get the architecture.""If there was a seamless integration between portal and IdentityMinder, then that would help a bit."

More CA Identity Suite [EOL] Cons →

"There are different compliances across the globe; RSA SecurID Access could be more complaint-based.""The interface needs to improve a lot. It should be easier to manage and navigate.""Sometimes, we encounter issues with other applications that are not compatible with RSA SecurID Access and require expert troubleshooting. At those times, we need additional support from an implementation perspective. This is an area where Oracle can improve as there is no substitute for reliable and efficient support.""It doesn't offer an agent-based or reverse-proxy-based approach to integration, which could enhance its flexibility."

More RSA SecurID Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is too high for SMBs."
  • "Omada continues to be very competitive on pricing, especially on the Omada cloud product."
  • "The initial total cost of ownership to implement Omada Identity is not small. The TCO for the implementation is as high as any other solution. However, the cost of maintaining the solution is at par or lower than competitors, including adding more features or maintaining the system after the initial deployment or installation to make sure that they are available for users to use or extending the functionalities of those activities. Those maintenance costs are lower than other vendors, but the initial cost of getting the system installed is still high."
  • "It is licensed per managed user per year."
  • "There were a lot of administrator, partner, and supplier accounts for people who were no longer working for us but still in the system. So, we reduced the number of users no longer with the company, which saved us some money on licensing."
  • "It's a fair price for the on-premises system. Compared with what we had before, it's much cheaper and we get all the modules in one. We tried to go with the cloud, but it was far too expensive."
  • "From an on-prem point of view, the cost is quite transparent and reasonable. The direct cost is primarily for licenses and maintenance on licenses."
  • "My client deals directly with the Omada Identity team in terms of licensing. I never look at pricing, so I'm not aware of how much the solution costs, but it's worth the money. Often, when you begin to use Omada Identity and it takes a while to set up, it'll be irreversible, and you'd depend on and focus more on the functionality of the solution, rather than its price tag."
  • More Omada Identity Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
  • "I think the price of this solution is reasonable compared to YubiKey and Duo given that it offers the same similar features."
  • "RSA SecurID Access is expensive."
  • More RSA SecurID Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We don't have to go in and do a lot of the work that we did before. It may have saved us somewhere in the range of 10 to… more »
    Top Answer:My client deals directly with the Omada Identity team in terms of licensing. I never look at pricing, so I'm not aware… more »
    Top Answer:There are some technical bits and pieces that we have looked at that could be better. For instance, when you do a… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The most valuable features of RSA SecurID Access are push notifications, multifactor authentication, and ease of… more »
    Top Answer:RSA SecurID Access is quite expensive. I would rate it a ten out of ten in terms of costliness.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in a few areas. Firstly, it lacks support for OIDC and OS capabilities, making it less… more »
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Omada Identity Suite, Omada Identity Cloud
    IdMLogic SIGMA
    RSA SecurID Access, RSA Access Manager
    Learn More
    Omada
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Omada Identity delivers an end-to-end identity and access management solution with essential identity governance functionality for secure, compliant, and efficient administration of all users' access rights across on-premises or cloud-based systems. The solution provides configurable best practice processes that covers all identity and access related scenarios from providing an access risk overview, management of identities lifecycle, to automated enforcement of policies.

    The CA Identity Suite provides comprehensive identity management and governance capabilities with a simple, intuitive user experience. This user experience can dramatically simplify processes such as user access requests and access certifications, resulting in improved productivity and user satisfaction. In addition, the CA Identity Suite performs risk analysis and certification and enables remediation actions in real-time during the access provisioning steps, thereby improving audit performance and risk posture with preventive policy enforcement.

    While providing these business and governance-centric capabilities for business users, the CA Identity Suite also delivers core enterprise-grade identity management and governance capabilities, including broad provisioning support for on-premise and cloud apps, extensibility and flexibility to integrate with other IT systems and consumer-grade scale. This means organizations are not forced to choose between usability and performance. With the CA Identity Suite, they can have both. 

    The RSA SecurID Suite combines the separate disciplines of access management and authentication with identity governance and user lifecycle management into one comprehensive suite. It goes way beyond the capabilities of traditional identity and access management systems by using risk analytics to provide identity and access assurance. This helps organizations solve two fundamental challenges:

    • Verifying that their users are who they say they are.
    • Providing their users with the right level of access.
    Sample Customers
    Bayer, ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, NuStar Energy, Unicredit, Schiphol Group
    Acciona, Comcast
    Milliman, Geisinger Health System, Advanced Micro Devices
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government16%
    Retailer14%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government7%
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Government14%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise77%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business56%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Identity Management (IM)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SailPoint, One Identity and others in Identity Management (IM). Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Identity Suite [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Identity Management (IM) while RSA SecurID is ranked 8th in Authentication Systems with 9 reviews. CA Identity Suite [EOL] is rated 8.2, while RSA SecurID is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CA Identity Suite [EOL] writes "Eliminates multiple infrastructure requirements and products, gives a holistic view of access granting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA SecurID writes "Enhanced security, reliable, helpful technical support, and easy to install". CA Identity Suite [EOL] is most compared with , whereas RSA SecurID is most compared with Yubico YubiKey, Microsoft Entra ID, PingID, Fortinet FortiToken and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine).

    We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.