CA IDMS vs TigerLogic XDMS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
203 views|162 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
TigerLogic Logo
26 views|11 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA IDMS and TigerLogic XDMS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Quest Software, SolarWinds and others in Database Development and Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Database Development and Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Do not hold back on asking questions about the maintenance and continued support of the product."
  • More CA IDMS Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Views
    203
    Comparisons
    162
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    18th
    Views
    26
    Comparisons
    11
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Database Development and Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Quest Software, SolarWinds and others in Database Development and Management. Updated: April 2024.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IDMS
    Learn More
    TigerLogic
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    CA IDMS is a reliable, high-performance, web-enabled Database Management system (DBMS) for IBM z Systems that provides business value for hundreds of enterprises and government organizations. CA IDMS provides high-performance database management and transaction processing performance for existing and new workloads, helping you consolidate business functions on a central data repository, as needed.
    TigerLogic XDMS is an enterprise native XML database management server with both data- and document-centric capabilities. The TigerLogic XDMS difference comes from its core technology: a data model that is optimal for managing and storing any kind of XML or non-XML data and its extensible XQuery Engine.
    Sample Customers
    Blue Hill Data Services Inc.
    Arts Management Systems, Future Chalk Software, Tek Service Srl, Just Software bvba, Senex, Am_tiq AG, CNM, WigaSoft AG, 24 ore software, Abraxas Juris AG, TheDataManager, Catalina Software, The Conrad Company, ADJob Nordic AB, J+D Software, Enviro Data, The International Education and Training Corporation, 888 Software Products Srl, Instinct Systems
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government19%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise2%
    Large Enterprise74%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Database Development and Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Quest Software, SolarWinds and others in Database Development and Management. Updated: April 2024.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA IDMS is ranked 31st in Database Development and Management while TigerLogic XDMS is ranked 18th in Non-Relational Databases. CA IDMS is rated 9.0, while TigerLogic XDMS is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CA IDMS writes "We get network database performance. It supports our back office". On the other hand, CA IDMS is most compared with IBM IMS, CA Database Management for DB2 for zOS, Adabas and CA Datacom, whereas TigerLogic XDMS is most compared with .

    We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.