• Home
  • CA NetMaster File Transfer Management vs. Flux

CA NetMaster File Transfer Management vs Flux comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo

CA NetMaster File Transfer Management

40 views|24 comparisons
Flux Logo

Flux

Read 2 Flux reviews
82 views|72 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA NetMaster File Transfer Management and Flux based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use CA NetMaster File Transfer Management?
Anonymous User
User-friendly, extensible product with great customer support. Would like better support for multiple workflows.
Ranking
39th
out of 42 in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Views
40
Comparisons
24
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
35th
out of 42 in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Views
82
Comparisons
72
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Broadcom
Flux
Overview

CA NetMaster File Transfer Management enables you to be aware of the status of critical file transfers and allows for actions based on defined data center policies. If you do any kind of file transport, CA NetMaster can provide you with enhanced visibility of your scheduled and unscheduled file transfers.

Flexible, integrated solution to meet highly complex processing needs with job scheduling, batch processor, and managed file transfer.

Flux automates batch processes into comprehensive workflows. Flux's batch job scheduling runs reports, triggers database jobs, runs Java code, executes ETL processes, transfers files, and runs command lines or shell scripts. Flux integrates batch job scheduling, managed file transfer, database queries and stored procedures, web services, and error handling to automate your batch job scheduling needs.

Sample Customers
Hill International, SAIF, Travelport, Sky
MetLife DHL Express The Clearing House Payments Company ADP Bank of New York Mellon Conway, Inc Carnegie Mellon University
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm23%
Manufacturing Company16%
Computer Software Company11%
Healthcare Company8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise80%
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is ranked 39th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while Flux is ranked 35th in Managed File Transfer (MFT). CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is rated 0.0, while Flux is rated 10.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Flux writes "User-friendly, extensible product with great customer support. Would like better support for multiple workflows". CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is most compared with , whereas Flux is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.