Compare CA NetMaster File Transfer Management vs. webMethods ActiveTransfer

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
41st
Views
16
Comparisons
6
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
33rd
Views
56
Comparisons
49
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, Advanced Systems Concepts, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer. Updated: April 2021.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

CA NetMaster File Transfer Management enables you to be aware of the status of critical file transfers and allows for actions based on defined data center policies. If you do any kind of file transport, CA NetMaster can provide you with enhanced visibility of your scheduled and unscheduled file transfers.

WHY ACTIVETRANSFER FOR MFT?
Imagine the simplicity of having a centralized console to easily manage partner files throughout your organization. That’s what you can do with webMethods ActiveTransfer for Managed File Transfer (MFT).

Using this secure, reliable, centrally managed file transfer system, you can:

-Exchange and schedule files of any size—even big data files—up to 25 times faster
-Centrally manage file transfers, set up transfer schedules and configure users
-Move large files quickly over long distances to increase partner response time
-Securely exchange files with partners using the latest security and encryption techniques
-Accelerate large file transfers by boosting performance 10 to 25 times, overcoming network
latency and boosting productivity
-Control transfer speeds and allocate necessary, network bandwidth to partners
-Ensure acceptance of file transfers from approved IP addresses and assigned users
-Schedule and create event-driven transfers
-Trigger file transfers as the events occurs, such as completion of a batch job

Offer
Learn more about CA NetMaster File Transfer Management
Learn more about webMethods ActiveTransfer
Sample Customers
Hill International, SAIF, Travelport, Sky
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, Advanced Systems Concepts, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer. Updated: April 2021.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is ranked 41st in Managed File Transfer while webMethods ActiveTransfer is ranked 33rd in Managed File Transfer. CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is rated 0.0, while webMethods ActiveTransfer is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is most compared with , whereas webMethods ActiveTransfer is most compared with WingFTP Managed File Transfer.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.