• Home
  • CA NetMaster File Transfer Management vs. XM SendSecure [EOL]

CA NetMaster File Transfer Management vs XM SendSecure [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA NetMaster File Transfer Management and XM SendSecure [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
39th
out of 42 in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Views
40
Comparisons
24
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Broadcom
OpenText
Overview

CA NetMaster File Transfer Management enables you to be aware of the status of critical file transfers and allows for actions based on defined data center policies. If you do any kind of file transport, CA NetMaster can provide you with enhanced visibility of your scheduled and unscheduled file transfers.

Discover OpenText XM SendSecure™, the enterprise-grade secure file exchange solution that balances defense-in-depth security with uncomplicated simplicity. Keep your data safe while facilitating compliance with HIPAA, PCI-DSS, GDPR, FERPA, SOX and more with an easy-to-use cloud-based solution.

Sample Customers
Hill International, SAIF, Travelport, Sky
OCHIN, Pacific Life Insurance Company, Neptune Energy, Department for International Development, British American Tobacco, ZOLL Medical, Matson Logistics
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is ranked 39th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while XM SendSecure [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT). CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is rated 0.0, while XM SendSecure [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is most compared with , whereas XM SendSecure [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.