We performed a comparison between CA NetQoS Performance Center [EOL] and Fortra's Intermapper based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software.Earn 20 points
Earn 20 points
CA NetQoS Performance Center [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Monitoring Software while Fortra's Intermapper is ranked 77th in Network Monitoring Software. CA NetQoS Performance Center [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Fortra's Intermapper is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CA NetQoS Performance Center [EOL] writes "We use it for monitoring our network, MPOS, and top-trending interfaces that are either over-utilized or under-utilized, though it'd be nice to do multiple domain authentication. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortra's Intermapper writes "It tremendously cuts down our troubleshooting timeframe, but needs advanced SLA monitoring and reporting". CA NetQoS Performance Center [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Fortra's Intermapper is most compared with Zabbix.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.