We performed a comparison between CA NetQoS Performance Center [EOL] and LogRhythm NetMon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software.Earn 20 points
CA NetQoS Performance Center [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Monitoring Software while LogRhythm NetMon is ranked 57th in Network Monitoring Software with 9 reviews. CA NetQoS Performance Center [EOL] is rated 7.6, while LogRhythm NetMon is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of CA NetQoS Performance Center [EOL] writes "We use it for monitoring our network, MPOS, and top-trending interfaces that are either over-utilized or under-utilized, though it'd be nice to do multiple domain authentication. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LogRhythm NetMon writes "A stable and scalable tool useful for network behavior analysis, DPA, and network forensic services". CA NetQoS Performance Center [EOL] is most compared with , whereas LogRhythm NetMon is most compared with PRTG Network Monitor, ObserverLIVE, SCOM and Zabbix.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.