We performed a comparison between CA NetQoS Performance Center [EOL] and Micro Focus Network Management Center [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software.More Micro Focus Network Management Center [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Earn 20 points
CA NetQoS Performance Center [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Monitoring Software while Micro Focus Network Management Center [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Monitoring Software. CA NetQoS Performance Center [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Micro Focus Network Management Center [EOL] is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CA NetQoS Performance Center [EOL] writes "We use it for monitoring our network, MPOS, and top-trending interfaces that are either over-utilized or under-utilized, though it'd be nice to do multiple domain authentication. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Network Management Center [EOL] writes "Easy to use, powerful and flexible. However there are bugs to work through". CA NetQoS Performance Center [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Micro Focus Network Management Center [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.