We performed a comparison between Broadcom Network Flow Analysis and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"This solution has helped our organization by allowing us to have visibility. We deal with cybersecurity, so visibility is very important."
"It is an overall stable solution."
"It not only provides the preconfigured item monitoring feature, but it is also easy to configure custom items."
"The integration with third-party tools and the alerts are most valuable."
"The overall functionality of Zabbix is very good. The monitoring of bank applications that Zabbix provides is great. The information is displayed on a dashboard that is easily viewed."
"Every new asset placed in the environment can be automatically detected, predicting human failures."
"The flexible licensing model is one of the solution's most valuable aspects. It really allows for great flexibility for companies."
"The pricing of the product is reasonable."
"Like other common Linux distributions, some of the most valuable features of this solution are the ease of use and deployment. It's simple and has a lot of packages and a lot of software."
"Our customers also like that they don't have to use multiple modules. Micro Focus and major vendors typically require you to buy several modules and plugins. Our customers do not like that. We offer them a single product for all their monitoring needs."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"I would like to see more security features, like a lost protection package."
"Currently, Broadcom Network Flow Analysis does not support high-availability solutions, making it an area that needs improvement."
"I am having difficulties connecting it to Grafana, as well as some of the other plugins like Kibana."
"I want Zabbix to improve the UX/UI. Zabbix doesn't use a JavaScript chart for images, and I want them to improve this."
"It should be easy to modify the front end."
"The performance reporting could be improved."
"In an upcoming release, there should be automated reports which we are currently doing manually. For example, if we collect a report file every day and want to send it to a moderator for review. We are expecting this feature to come out soon but it would be valuable to have now."
"Even though it’s such a powerful monitoring system, it would be more helpful if it had a flexible UI."
"There's a small module of APM, however, it is not an enhanced version. People usually ask for a full-fledged APM solution."
"The System Center Operations Manager can be improved."
More Broadcom Network Flow Analysis Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Broadcom Network Flow Analysis is ranked 63rd in Network Monitoring Software with 2 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 25 reviews. Broadcom Network Flow Analysis is rated 8.4, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Broadcom Network Flow Analysis writes "A stable tool that helps identify the complete flow analysis in a network". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Very mature, easy to scale, and free to use". Broadcom Network Flow Analysis is most compared with WatchTower Security Management App and Wireshark, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios XI and Nagios Core. See our Broadcom Network Flow Analysis vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.