OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs OpenText Operations Bridge comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Operations Bridge and OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, ServiceNow, Microsoft and others in Event Monitoring.
To learn more, read our detailed Event Monitoring Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Flexible dashboard with the availability of widgets.""The event correlation is the most valuable aspect of the solution.""We haven't faced any stability issues. There hasn't been any crashes or glitches.""It allows us to build dashboards for individual parts of the business. Our team members appreciate that they can just get a view of their part of the world without having to worry about anyone else's.""The most valuable feature is that everything can be consolidated into one dashboard.""I find the Micro Focus Operations Bridge dashboard valuable, including its instrument analysis and anomaly control features that help indicate root causes and problems with your infrastructure.""It's a very good product overall.""Purely, its flexibility is the most valuable aspect. It is hugely configurable."

More OpenText Operations Bridge Pros →

"I can and interrupt what's going on, bring a job down if I need to, and bring it back up.""Valuable features include: SSM, which provides for orderly startup and shutdown; OPSLOG, which enables filtering by message-id, and/or jobname(s); Rules, as OPS/REXX interface streamlines deployment, interfaces easily with JES2 and z/OS.""​The follow-up surprised me. Making sure that I am happy with what I have gone to them on. They will call after I have made changes and verify that I am happy with the changes that I did have to make. If it did not fix the complete problem, they go back over it until I am satisfied.​""It alerts the operators when it is time to repair the communications and the IPLs.""It allows us to respond faster to issues. If there are issues that come out, we're able to capture a message and alert somebody about it.""Because we can define complex commands, the training of new operators is quicker. We can also put checks in place, that will prevent user errors.""​The service has been wonderful. I like the people that I have had to deal with. The process is very straightforward. I call or use the website.""If something breaks and it goes down when it's not supposed to, automation brings it right back up."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Pros →

Cons
"I'm not aware of areas that need improvement.""I know that in the next version, X1005, they're moving to more graphical overviews, which should help our senior managers.""The solution is overall "heavy", requiring multiple servers, even without HA.""Installing and upgrading the HPOM and Operations Agent software is not always easy and the process can be quite fragile. Once it is running, it is very quick and stable, but an upgrade can quite easily break something or terminate unexpectedly.""The initial setup is a little bit complex.""The setup process can get a little bit complex.""The price is quite expensive, and because of this, we may try another solution.""In a future release, we would like an improved upgrade process. When you upgrade it now, it first uninstalls everything and then reinstalls all the packages, which means any customization that you've done in the directories on the surface disappears."

More OpenText Operations Bridge Cons →

"Performing a stop/restart of OPS/MVS could be a little smoother. Without special coding, some undesired tasks will be started and some necessary tasks will be stopped if we have to bounce OPS/MVS during the day.""Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions.""​It’s a complex product. The initial installation is easy, but implementing various functions is a constant process.​""The GUI interface could be improved, but that is coming. They are working on that.""The interfaces to USS, CA UIM could be better. CA Common Services interfaces - namely Zdata Mover, Zmessage Service, Zdatacolletcor - are poorly documented.""One thing that comes to mind is the MQ interface. The last time we tried to use it, it seemed a little clunky.""Scalability is zero. It cannot be scaled because of its age.""Some of the command sequences are too long."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Setup costs can be high depending on the partner, but it is worth it."
  • "It is competitive."
  • "Pricing is very flexible and depends on the modules selected as per the requirement."
  • "The licensing cost for this solution is approximately $1,000 USD."
  • "The cost is very high."
  • "As OpsBridge is a suite of products bundled together, you may find yourself paying for software functionality that you don't actually use, e.g. Real User Monitor (RUM)."
  • "The licensing model for Micro Focus Operations Bridge is unit-based so it can be one device or ten devices depending on your situation or model. Cost-wise, it's much more if you have more devices and features such as infrastructure monitoring, analytic dashboard, and business dashboard in your model."
  • More OpenText Operations Bridge Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The licensing model for Micro Focus Operations Bridge is unit-based so it can be one device or ten devices depending on your situation or model. Cost-wise, it's much more if you have more devices and… more »
    Top Answer:I'm not aware of areas that need improvement.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    8th
    out of 20 in Event Monitoring
    Views
    1,254
    Comparisons
    544
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    513
    Rating
    7.7
    14th
    out of 20 in Event Monitoring
    Views
    156
    Comparisons
    113
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Operations Bridge, Operations Bridge Manager, Micro Focus Operations Analytics
    CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation
    Learn More
    Overview
    OpenText Operations Bridge – SaaS is enterprise event and performance management software. With automated discovery, monitoring, and remediation, it fast-tracks your move to full-stack AIOps across multicloud and on- premises environments.
    z/OS, its subsystems, databases, middleware, applications, and software generate thousands of event messages daily. IT professionals need a tool to filter, prioritize, and respond quickly to these events before they impact availability and threaten business processing and associated service level agreements. CA OPS/MVS EMA automates processes, enabling you to resolve problems as they arise. It also automates more routine tasks, simplifying IT management and operations.
    Sample Customers
    GE Money Bank, Bank AlJazira, Tech Mahindra
    Tieto
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm40%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Computer Software Company20%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company20%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Government9%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm57%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    Insurance Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm34%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Logistics Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business4%
    Large Enterprise96%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business6%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise89%
    Buyer's Guide
    Event Monitoring
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, ServiceNow, Microsoft and others in Event Monitoring. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText Operations Bridge is ranked 8th in Event Monitoring with 44 reviews while OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is ranked 14th in Event Monitoring. OpenText Operations Bridge is rated 7.8, while OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of OpenText Operations Bridge writes "Good event correlation capabilities, promotes a self-service approach to monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence writes "The ability to use command rules is great when our operators have repetitive tasks, but we'd like to automate off of different highlighted messages without actually knowing what the message is". OpenText Operations Bridge is most compared with SCOM, OpsRamp, Splunk Enterprise Security, BMC Helix Monitor and IDERA SQL Diagnostic Manager for SQL Server, whereas OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is most compared with BMC MainView, IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON, SCOM, BMC TrueSight Operations Management and DX Spectrum.

    See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors.

    We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.