CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation vs Micro Focus Operations Manager

CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation is ranked 5th in Event Monitoring with 23 reviews vs Micro Focus Operations Manager which is ranked 8th in Event Monitoring with 8 reviews. The top reviewer of CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation writes "Individual rules for various events can be updated in flight without bouncing the product". The top reviewer of Micro Focus Operations Manager writes "Scalable tool that integrates with different products. I want to see better event planning". CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation is most compared with CA SYSVIEW, Micro Focus Operations Bridge and CA Mainframe Software Manager. Micro Focus Operations Manager is most compared with SCOM, BMC TrueSight Operations Management and IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus. See our CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation vs Micro Focus Operations Manager report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Ca ops mvs event management and automation vs. micro focus operations manager report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation vs. Micro Focus Operations Manager and others in Event Monitoring
253,522 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation vs Micro Focus Operations Manager

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
Once automatic IPL has been defined, anyone can perform an IPL with very little intervention. We know that all of the components will be started correctly.Because we can define complex commands, the training of new operators is quicker. We can also put checks in place, that will prevent user errors.It alerts the operators when it is time to repair the communications and the IPLs.I do not have to keep recordings. It is there and is proactive. It helps the operators, human editors, and me.​The follow-up surprised me. Making sure that I am happy with what I have gone to them on. They will call after I have made changes and verify that I am happy with the changes that I did have to make. If it did not fix the complete problem, they go back over it until I am satisfied.​​The service has been wonderful. I like the people that I have had to deal with. The process is very straightforward. I call or use the website.The performance of it is beyond exceptional. It is probably one of the best products that I have ever worked with. It is easy to use, comprehensive, and can perform almost any task you need it to.Stability is probably the best out-of-the-box. Put it in, set it up, and you leave it alone. It works wonderfully.

Read more »

The Performance Manager provides great insight into our systems' performance.It has greatly reduced the number and duration of outages as support teams are notified immediately when something goes wrong or even before something breaks.The integration with the ticketing tool makes sure that there is a record for every issue.

Read more »

Cons
​It’s a complex product. The initial installation is easy, but implementing various functions is a constant process.​The GUI interface could be improved, but that is coming. They are working on that.The further expansion of the mainframe teamcenter interface. Also, the web services support is something that I am looking into.Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions.It definitely needs more web-based interface, to be more mobile-open. More APIs, more open source to it.Scalability is zero. It cannot be scaled because of its age.Some of the command sequences are too long.The reason sometimes it is not stable, we do not have the expertise to write the script.​

Read more »

Installing and upgrading the HPOM and Operations Agent software is not always easy and the process can be quite fragile. Once it is running, it is very quick and stable, but an upgrade can quite easily break something or terminate unexpectedly.

Read more »

Ca ops mvs event management and automation vs. micro focus operations manager report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation vs. Micro Focus Operations Manager and others in Event Monitoring
253,522 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
2,356
Comparisons
482
Reviews
22
Followers
528
Avg. Rating
9.3
Views
3,932
Comparisons
2,106
Reviews
8
Followers
489
Avg. Rating
7.6
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation competitors »See more Micro Focus Operations Manager competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsUnicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and AutomationHPE Operations Manager
Website/Video
Website/VideoCA Technologies
  • Vendor 6987 screenshot 1516099828
Micro Focus
  • Vendor 7619 screenshot 1516468546
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overviewz/OS, its subsystems, databases, middleware, applications, and software generate thousands of event messages daily. IT professionals need a tool to filter, prioritize, and respond quickly to these events before they impact availability and threaten business processing and associated service level agreements. CA OPS/MVS EMA automates processes, enabling you to resolve problems as they arise. It also automates more routine tasks, simplifying IT management and operations.

Micro Focus Operations Manager is infrastructure monitoring software that proactively performs root cause analysis to help you reduce the time to repair and the cost of operations management.

Sample Customers
Sample CustomersTietoMTS India
Ca ops mvs event management and automation vs. micro focus operations manager report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation vs. Micro Focus Operations Manager and others in Event Monitoring
Download now
253,522 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email