CA Output Management Web Viewer (CA OM Web Viewer) vs Hyland Perceptive Content comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Output Management Web Viewer (CA OM Web Viewer) and Hyland Perceptive Content based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Box, DocuWare, Hyland and others in Document Management Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Document Management Software Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
342
Comparisons
232
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
173
Comparisons
128
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Document Management Software
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Box, DocuWare, Hyland and others in Document Management Software. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
ImageNow
Learn More
Hyland
Video Not Available
Overview

CA Output Management Web Viewer (CA OM Web Viewer) delivers a web-based access point for the distribution and viewing of reports and related documents.
It allows you to define every aspect of access and to specify exactly how and when individuals can interact with your documents.

CA OM Web Viewer can reduce the costs associated with producing multiple hard copies of reports, while bringing greater security to your information. This solution also maintains your documents on the mainframe, allowing your users to view them but not to store them.

Perceptive Content is a scalable content services platform that manages the entire content lifecycle, from capture to disposition. Flexible functionality across multiple business applications, integration with virtually any business application and a simple-to-use interface help Perceptive Content transform internal processes and the customer experience. Perceptive Content helps users work smarter by surfacing content in context with other relevant business information. Digital documents can be viewed simultaneously, which promotes enhanced collaboration and communication among employees, customers and vendors. Locating relevant documents in the context of a business process increases customer satisfaction and employee productivity. Automated lifecycle management helps organizations comply with their records and retention policies, which reduces the risk of compliance violations and resulting fees and fines.

Sample Customers
State of Oregon, State of Nebraska, Innovapost
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm37%
Government24%
Insurance Company9%
Computer Software Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
University20%
Government18%
Computer Software Company9%
Financial Services Firm7%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise89%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise72%
Buyer's Guide
Document Management Software
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Box, DocuWare, Hyland and others in Document Management Software. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA Output Management Web Viewer (CA OM Web Viewer) is ranked 6th in Document Management Software while Hyland Perceptive Content is ranked 12th in Document Management Software. CA Output Management Web Viewer (CA OM Web Viewer) is rated 0.0, while Hyland Perceptive Content is rated 6.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Hyland Perceptive Content writes "With workflows, a group of people can be working on appeals and forward them all to one queue". CA Output Management Web Viewer (CA OM Web Viewer) is most compared with DocuWare, whereas Hyland Perceptive Content is most compared with Hyland OnBase, Box, SharePoint and Alfresco.

See our list of best Document Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Document Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.