Broadcom Payment Security vs RSA Adaptive Authentication comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Broadcom Payment Security and RSA Adaptive Authentication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I think for us, the value that we get out of CA is their effective scheme diagnostics.""In terms of the fraud that we see on the card site, card not present fraud, the person gives contribution to what the total fraud has increased substantially.""I use this product to extract cases from there and then send it to Ops to review and analyze.""For us, it enables the bank or the issuer to offer their customers protection on their online transactions.""The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and"

More Broadcom Payment Security Pros →

"The capability to manage your business policy related to security when required without vendor involvement.""The most valuable feature is the stock tokens. That works the best for us.""Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features.""Risk Engine’s risk score, eFN, GeoIP, and device binding all coming together in the Policy Rules to decide when to escalate to MFA.""Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost reductions. They can stop fraud from their customers, then their customers can have a better experience from their services."

More RSA Adaptive Authentication Pros →

Cons
"The service is improving with the implementation of 3D Secure 2.0.""Probably having more flexibility and working on usability and how we use the solution.""I think improvements for us, it's making it simple enough that anybody can understand how it works.""I had wish it would be this one, this authentication for fingerprint and face would be promising.""This solution can improve around the challenge rates and the failures."

More Broadcom Payment Security Cons →

"RSA Adaptive Authentication lacks a mechanism to verify the identity of a new user in the Enrollment event workflow.""It has taken years to implement.""The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated.""I would like to see a more adaptive type of solution, something that we could use on our web pages...""Reporting modules is one of the major areas that can be improved further.""Better filters when searching for events. The current features for current filters when searching fraud events are not very comprehensive. You can only filter by certain fields in the transaction."

More RSA Adaptive Authentication Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."
  • More Broadcom Payment Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "You may need to opt for second best if funding is low and the number of users is huge. However, the pricing is able to be negotiated if your user figures are huge."
  • "Keep the proxy service layer on premises. That consumes SaaS security services on the back-end."
  • "Customers need to deploy the solution in a very expensive infrastructure. RSA should should think about a less expensive infrastructure for customers because the solution costs around $100,000, and the infrastructure needed to support that solution may be even more expensive than that price."
  • "The pricing is $50 per head, yearly."
  • More RSA Adaptive Authentication Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Views
    298
    Comparisons
    191
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    25th
    Views
    327
    Comparisons
    272
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite
    Learn More
    Broadcom
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Find the balance. Payment Security delivers more secure online transactions with an excellent customer experience.

    Card-not-present (CNP) fraud costs billions of dollars annually across the globe. Issuers, processors and merchants need new applications to fight back with security that doesn’t get in the way of business.

    Broadcom has the answer. With our industry-leading authentication solutions, you benefit from:

    • The largest global consortium network of real-time transaction data
    • Patented predictive neural network models for highly accurate, real-time decision-making
    • Unsurpassed leadership in EMV 3-D Secure

    You maintain full control over your authentication strategy, fraud systems and policies. Simply said, our solutions help you lower your costs and accelerate your business success.

    RSA Adaptive Authentication is a risk-based two-factor authentication solution providing cost-effective protection for an entire user base. Adaptive Authentication secures online portals, SSL VPNs, and web access management portals for different types of organizations in the healthcare, insurance, enterprise, government, financial services, and other industries. Based on the transparent two-factor authentication technology, Adaptive Authentication works behind the scenes to authenticate end users and transactions based on individual end user and device profiles. In addition, Adaptive Authentication uses the RSA Risk Engine to estimate the level of risk for the specific activity and uses information collected from the RSAeFraudNetwork (a cross-organization, cross-application, cross-border online fraud network) to identify fraudulent activities. The Policy Manager determines what actions must be performed, depending on the risk score and other parameters.
    Sample Customers
    Eurocard
    ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm100%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Computer Software Company30%
    Real Estate/Law Firm6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm45%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Insurance Company5%
    Healthcare Company5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business6%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise86%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise77%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Broadcom Payment Security is ranked 25th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while RSA Adaptive Authentication is ranked 25th in Authentication Systems. Broadcom Payment Security is rated 8.8, while RSA Adaptive Authentication is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Broadcom Payment Security writes "Versatility in rule variables allows for customization and optimization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Adaptive Authentication writes "It stops fraud in banks and reduces their costs". Broadcom Payment Security is most compared with Broadcom EMV 3-D Secure (3DS), whereas RSA Adaptive Authentication is most compared with RSA Authentication Manager, ThreatMetrix, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and IBM Trusteer.

    We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.