We performed a comparison between DX Performance Management and Fortinet FortiGate Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two DX NetOps solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You can create intelligent alerts so you have enough time to replace the router or interface before it's full. The same is applicable for CBQoS channels."
"Downloads and records are the most valuable features."
"It saves time having it all on one place, so you do not have to jump around from different tools and try to merge the data. It is already done for you."
"The solution's performance itself is very good because it is a vertical database that loads very fast in comparison to other products."
"There is a good amount of vendor certification which comes with the product. That's all factory-loaded, no need to load any custom-made files. Most of the metrics are calibrated and captured from the devices based on the defaults available from vendor certification."
"It is very easy to add devices; just be aware that it requires SNMP to be enabled."
"The tool helps us understand network performance."
"My sales representative, I would not trade him in for the world. He has done a really good job. I am really happy with him."
"The ability to manage everything from the cloud is going to be the most valuable by far with this solution."
"Fortinet FortiGate Cloud has security features like DDoS protection and UTM."
"The sandboxing feature is very important."
"The intel we get from Fortinet is its most valuable aspect."
"The initial setup is relatively easy."
"Everything is valuable, especially the SD-WAN tunneling, filtering of email, application, and browsing. Everything has value."
"One firewall box can contain various top-of-the-line services that are packaged together for easy administration."
"The solution offers good network performance and efficiency."
"It would be helpful if CA provided online training for its customers."
"It needs role-based administration."
"We would like to be capable of reporting network performance with a report strictly focused on the times outside business hours, which CA PM does not currently support. We have discontinued the use of the Business Hours Filtering until CA engineers are able to resolve or offer guidance."
"CA PM can be complex to build and configure. Creating the folders / groups / sites required establishing many rule sets."
"When it goes through discovery, or whatever it is doing in the back-end that slows it down, sometimes we get some failures with it. "
"For CA PM, there should be a way of easily migrating the reports coming from eHealth going to CA Performance Center, since CA PC is replacing eHealth."
"There are some areas in the technology right now, like with VMs, where we are lacking with our abilities to get inside the VM to monitor traffic within the machine."
"I think it would be helpful having a more comprehensive set of certifications so that I could natively deploy devices to my environment and the tool would immediately recognize and immediately be able to provide relevant performance information without a lot of tuning on my part."
"I would like to see more reporting from the analysis improved in the future."
"Having a built-in SOC solution like an XDR platform within the solution would be convenient for customers."
"There are European and US clouds and sometimes we mix them up. The solution should make determining the clouds more clear, or make one cloud instead of having separate ones."
"The solution should allow users to keep the data for longer than the current periods. I can't get any historic data after more than a month. I would like to be able to, after a year, look for trends from the past 12 months. It would make things much easier."
"ACL is an area with shortcomings that needs to be improved."
"Lacks some security against external attacks."
"GUI access could be improved. It should be simpler to access everything from the portal. Once we log in to the portal, we should be able to access all the Fortinet Cloud options."
"It would be better for us if Fortinet provided a private cloud, and they should provide more security on the public cloud. There are some minor issues with security with the public cloud. For example, anyone with a link can access the public cloud."
DX Performance Management is ranked 2nd in DX NetOps with 31 reviews while Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is ranked 5th in Firewall Security Management with 55 reviews. DX Performance Management is rated 8.2, while Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of DX Performance Management writes "The vertical database loads faster than any other product available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud writes "Useful for routing and cloud security purposes but needs to incorporate XDR capabilities ". DX Performance Management is most compared with DX Spectrum, OmniPeek and Zabbix, whereas Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is most compared with Fortinet FortiManager, AWS Firewall Manager, Palo Alto Networks Panorama, FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) and Fortinet FortiPortal. See our DX Performance Management vs. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud report.
We monitor all DX NetOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.