We performed a comparison between DX Performance Management and Fortinet FortiSIEM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two DX NetOps solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There is a good amount of vendor certification which comes with the product. That's all factory-loaded, no need to load any custom-made files. Most of the metrics are calibrated and captured from the devices based on the defaults available from vendor certification."
"The tool helps us understand network performance."
"My sales representative, I would not trade him in for the world. He has done a really good job. I am really happy with him."
"The integration with NetFlow, the NFA solution, so that we can have our flow forensics paired with the SNMP polling performance metrics on the same page."
"We're able to present data from multiple back-end collection sources into a single dashboard for the users. So they don't have to go to multiple locations to get data about a particular item, or device."
"Downloads and records are the most valuable features."
"The capability where not only the traditional SNMP information is captured but also the netflow data; who is consuming the data on the WAN, and voice-related information, is helpful. The voice quality makes it very easy for first- and second-line operators to see where the issue is, and who is impacted."
"Great dashboards and good integration with other solutions."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiSIEM is the correlation of many events."
"There are things like dashboards and reports (pre-configured and custom) that let me know that things are operating the way they should be, and when they are not."
"The solution is easy to use and user-friendly."
"The solution is very stable. It's run for years without the need to do anything except, add new patches when they are available, which are always a good idea to install."
"FortiSIEM helped us discover all the threats at the time that were attacking the IT services of the company. We now have multiple-level authentication."
"To add workers and even collectors is pretty easy."
"We find the solution to be stable."
"The most valuable feature is the dashboard. CMDB database collects data from a lot of pre-configured devices."
"I'm not a fan of many extra features since they usually burden the software and reduce its reliability."
"It needs role-based administration."
"This solution's implementation process could be quicker. They could also optimize the hardware requirements."
"It would be helpful if CA provided online training for its customers."
"Even though we can see when something is not available, it would also be it would be nice if some sort of alerting took place to that you could know immediately if something went down."
"I think it would be helpful having a more comprehensive set of certifications so that I could natively deploy devices to my environment and the tool would immediately recognize and immediately be able to provide relevant performance information without a lot of tuning on my part."
"For CA PM, there should be a way of easily migrating the reports coming from eHealth going to CA Performance Center, since CA PC is replacing eHealth."
"It seems like we escalate more than I would like to. If anything, they should look at how the tier support goes in place."
"FortiSIEM could be better integrated with other vendors."
"Not very good on non-API features, lacks that functionality."
"When compared with some competitors, in terms of performance, the CPU and RAM requirements and the capability of coordination with development all need some improvement."
"The only drawback is the licensing model. It can get expensive if you want to integrate more solutions."
"The biggest thing that could be better is a quicker response to support cases."
"The interface needs some improvements because it's a bit cumbersome when you're trying to view items. It takes some time to get used to. Additionally, sometimes the scrolling does not work."
"Fortinet FortiSIEM could improve by having a signature update."
"Creating parsers to try make unknown events or currently unsupported devices produce meaningful information is extremely cumbersome."
DX Performance Management is ranked 2nd in DX NetOps with 31 reviews while Fortinet FortiSIEM is ranked 8th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 63 reviews. DX Performance Management is rated 8.2, while Fortinet FortiSIEM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of DX Performance Management writes "The vertical database loads faster than any other product available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSIEM writes "It's cheaper than other solutions with the same features but lacks integration with many third-party vendors". DX Performance Management is most compared with DX Spectrum, Zabbix and OmniPeek, whereas Fortinet FortiSIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, LogRhythm SIEM and Wazuh. See our DX Performance Management vs. Fortinet FortiSIEM report.
We monitor all DX NetOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
