DX Performance Management vs Hitachi JP1 Performance Management [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. ​"
  • "Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."
  • "They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."
  • "I like the licensing model because it's device-based."
  • "We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."
  • "The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."
  • More DX Performance Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure Capacity Planning solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool helps us understand network performance.
    Top Answer:The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices.
    Top Answer:DX Performance Management should increase high availability. If one of my two data centers goes offline and the other is operational, I need a seamless transition from the primary to the secondary… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    117
    Comparisons
    70
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    512
    Rating
    8.4
    Unranked
    In Infrastructure Capacity Planning
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA Performance Management
    Hitachi JP1/Performance Management, JPI, PFM
    Learn More
    Overview

    CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

    The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

    Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

    JP1/Performance Management supports stable system operation throughout all phases (from when problems are identified to when they are resolved) by collecting operational information from targets that range from OSs and databases to various types of applications. You can then use information that you collected to analyze system performance. This product supports both on-premises and cloud environments and can be used to efficiently monitor a wide variety of targets without the use of specialized monitoring tools.
    JP1/Performance Management's extensive array of functions includes monitoring functions that send notifications to JP1/Integrated Management when warning signs of possible problems are detected, and reporting functions that are useful for tuning and for investigating the causes of problems based on collected operational data. By continuously collecting operational data and comparing the current data against data from the past, you can identify areas that are likely to become bottlenecks. This allows you to carry out more reliable capacity planning that does not rely on guesswork.

    Sample Customers
    Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG 
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Insurance Company24%
    Comms Service Provider19%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business17%
    Large Enterprise83%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise67%
    No Data Available

    DX Performance Management is ranked 2nd in Infrastructure Capacity Planning with 31 reviews while Hitachi JP1 Performance Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Infrastructure Capacity Planning. DX Performance Management is rated 8.2, while Hitachi JP1 Performance Management [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of DX Performance Management writes "The vertical database loads faster than any other product available". On the other hand, DX Performance Management is most compared with DX Spectrum, Zabbix and OmniPeek, whereas Hitachi JP1 Performance Management [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Infrastructure Capacity Planning vendors.

    We monitor all Infrastructure Capacity Planning reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.