We performed a comparison between DX Performance Management and OpenText Network Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom and others in DX NetOps."You can have thousands of devices inside and hundreds of thousands of interphases without a problem."
"Downloads and records are the most valuable features."
"One feature I like about CA Performance Management is the certification of the devices."
"It is very easy to add devices; just be aware that it requires SNMP to be enabled."
"What is most useful is visibility."
"It is the gathering of the whole performance data in our environment and our network environment, for us and our customers."
"There is another component of the tool called Network Flow Analysis. It gives us the ability to troubleshoot issues which do not appear right away."
"My sales representative, I would not trade him in for the world. He has done a really good job. I am really happy with him."
"When compared with SolarWinds, it is more user-friendly, and tasks can be completed more quickly."
"Pushing the network configuration to bulk devices. This saves a considerable amount of time that the engineer spends in pushing the network configuration."
"I have mixed feeling about the scalability. I feel like there are things which are being put into UIM right now that are not being included in Performance Center that we need to see in Performance Center. We are kind of being driven to buy UIM, and I can't justify it."
"Since we are out of registered IP space, we are moving to ipv6 and we expect our vendors to move with us, and they have not delivered yet."
"The quantity of views which are tied to specific metric families is too high. Also, the problem is the view doesn't tell you which metric family it uses, so you don't know why you don't see data."
"Policies could be improved."
"I would like to have more tasks, graphs, and possibilities for linking to the graphs and reports added to the solution."
"The solution could improve the database model. It is also not very good because they have a lot of interconnections with other data sources, such as NFA and VNA."
"We experience disconnections between the solutions own components."
"It needs role-based administration."
"Compatibility of the devices needs to be enhanced, as it seems to be limited."
"Level one administration task can be defined in Micro Focus Network Automation but it could be more simplified."
Earn 20 points
DX Performance Management is ranked 2nd in DX NetOps with 31 reviews while OpenText Network Automation is ranked 12th in Network Automation. DX Performance Management is rated 8.2, while OpenText Network Automation is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of DX Performance Management writes "The vertical database loads faster than any other product available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Network Automation writes "Helps the configuration backup be validated before and after any change in the network infrastructure". DX Performance Management is most compared with DX Spectrum, OmniPeek and Zabbix, whereas OpenText Network Automation is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager, BackBox and NetBrain.
We monitor all DX NetOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.