"I can get it to run a report showing, for instance, what root drives are in the critical range in terms of being full, like 90 percent full, and disseminate that information to the other areas of the organization."
"We're able to present data from multiple back-end collection sources into a single dashboard for the users. So they don't have to go to multiple locations to get data about a particular item, or device."
"The feature that is inherent to its core, of being able to graphically represent a trend and status, is nice."
"It is very easy to add devices; just be aware that it requires SNMP to be enabled."
"The integration to the other products that we use: NFA, we use ADA, we use Spectrum; and CAPM integrates all those into a single pane of glass."
"What is most useful is visibility."
"The out-of-the-box dashboards are valuable, in terms of being able to visualize performance data in ways that we haven't in the past."
"The ability to quickly do drag and drop customized reports for dashboards."
"The product can scale."
"I think it would be helpful having a more comprehensive set of certifications so that I could natively deploy devices to my environment and the tool would immediately recognize and immediately be able to provide relevant performance information without a lot of tuning on my part."
"It seems like we escalate more than I would like to. If anything, they should look at how the tier support goes in place."
"It would be helpful if CA provided online training for its customers."
"It could be a little easier to integrate new metrics."
"This tool gathers so much data, which makes it hard to convert over. To upgrade it, you really need the solution backed up. That is the issue that we are facing right now."
"Install is done as root, which is a security no-no, and the database IO requirements were not stated correctly, which lead to a year of instability."
"The quantity of views which are tied to specific metric families is too high. Also, the problem is the view doesn't tell you which metric family it uses, so you don't know why you don't see data."
"Even though we can see when something is not available, it would also be it would be nice if some sort of alerting took place to that you could know immediately if something went down."
"I can't recall coming across any missing features."
DX Performance Management is ranked 2nd in DX NetOps with 31 reviews while Scout APM is ranked 30th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 1 review. DX Performance Management is rated 8.2, while Scout APM is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of DX Performance Management writes "The vertical database loads faster than any other product available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Scout APM writes "Great visibility and reliability with fair pricing". DX Performance Management is most compared with DX Spectrum, Zabbix and OmniPeek, whereas Scout APM is most compared with Zabbix, Datadog, Prometheus, Grafana and New Relic.
We monitor all DX NetOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
