We performed a comparison between CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Privileged Access Management (PAM) while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews. CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is rated 7.8, while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] writes "I like that the access control on the agent. Installation is difficult". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is most compared with , whereas CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.