• Home
  • CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] vs. Fudo PAM

CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] vs Fudo PAM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] and Fudo PAM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).
To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
I like that the access control on the agent. Installation is difficult.
It gives us the ability to track who is using what ID and for what purpose.
Oleksiy-Zaionchkovskyy
Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."

    • More Fudo PAM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Fudo PAM?
    Top Answer:Session recording and password management are the two main aspects.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Fudo PAM?
    Top Answer:There are some areas for improvement in the Fudo PAM cake that we want to improve in terms of scaling. Scaling is an optional feature because we closed some big projects with enterprise customers from… more »
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Fudo PAM?
    Top Answer:The main use case is for protecting privileged user access, such as securing remote access services. Another important use case is when we work with third-party users and need to provide password… more »
    Read all 5 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Privileged Access Management (PAM)
    21st
    out of 48 in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
    Views
    1,091
    Comparisons
    638
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA Access Control, CA Privileged Identity Manager
    Fudo Privileged Access Management
    Learn More
    Broadcom
    Fudo Security
    Overview
    CA Access Control provides tools to protect your system in both ways against unauthorized use of computer resources: block unauthorized users from accessing the system and block authorized users from accessing items to which they should not have access. CA Access Control also provides auditing tools that let you trace users' activities to track attempted misuse of the computer system.

    We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

    Sample Customers
    Colruyt Group, Logicalis, TIS Inc.
    KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Media Company8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Buyer's Guide
    Privileged Access Management (PAM)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Privileged Access Management (PAM) while Fudo PAM is ranked 21st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 5 reviews. CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is rated 7.8, while Fudo PAM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] writes "I like that the access control on the agent. Installation is difficult". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fudo PAM writes "Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization". CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Fudo PAM is most compared with WALLIX Bastion, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Delinea Secret Server, One Identity Safeguard and ManageEngine PAM360.

    See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

    We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.