CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] vs Fortra's Powertech Identity & Access Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] and Fortra's Powertech Identity & Access Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).
To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Views
73
Comparisons
61
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA Access Control, CA Privileged Identity Manager
HelpSystems Powertech Identity & Access Manager, Powertech Identity & Access Manager, BoKS, BoKS ServerControl, Fox Technologies ApplicationControl, ApplicationControl
Learn More
Fortra
Video Not Available
Overview
CA Access Control provides tools to protect your system in both ways against unauthorized use of computer resources: block unauthorized users from accessing the system and block authorized users from accessing items to which they should not have access. CA Access Control also provides auditing tools that let you trace users' activities to track attempted misuse of the computer system.

Powertech Identity & Access Manager (BoKS) transforms your multi-vendor Linux and UNIX server environment into one centrally managed security domain. It simplifies your organization’s ability to enforce security policies, and control access to critical systems and information. With full control over accounts, access and privilege, IT and security teams can proactively prevent internal and external attacks on critical systems before they start.

Sample Customers
Colruyt Group, Logicalis, TIS Inc.
Integris Health
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise44%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Privileged Access Management (PAM) while Fortra's Powertech Identity & Access Manager is ranked 39th in Privileged Access Management (PAM). CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is rated 7.8, while Fortra's Powertech Identity & Access Manager is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] writes "I like that the access control on the agent. Installation is difficult". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortra's Powertech Identity & Access Manager writes "Inexperienced support for old product, but good flexibility for use case customization". CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Fortra's Powertech Identity & Access Manager is most compared with .

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.