• Home
  • CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] vs. IBM Security Secret Server

CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] vs IBM Security Secret Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] and IBM Security Secret Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).
To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
I like that the access control on the agent. Installation is difficult.
It gives us the ability to track who is using what ID and for what purpose.
Anonymous User
The tool provides high availability and stability to its users
We have some clients in the healthcare environment. So, we need to verify with them all the information of a patient starting from the time when he... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I believe that we paid 35,000 or 40,000 US dollars for it."
  • "My rating for the IBM Security Secret Server pricing is seven out of ten. It could be cheaper."
  • "The price could be better. I think it's a good price for the on-premises environment and the high availability for enterprises the solution provides."

    • More IBM Security Secret Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about IBM Security Secret Server?
    Top Answer:Stability-wise, I think it is a very good solution.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What needs improvement with IBM Security Secret Server?
    Top Answer:The nonclustered index is working in an area with a problem that needs improvement. In some cases, when they create some index in the tool, you may face some problems with the parallelism and some… more »
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for IBM Security Secret Server?
    Top Answer:I use the tool for dynamic services, integration services, and reporting services. I have years of working experience with the tool. I am a DBA and a support administrator for SQL Server, and also all… more »
    Read all 5 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Privileged Access Management (PAM)
    13th
    out of 48 in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
    Views
    816
    Comparisons
    544
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    686
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA Access Control, CA Privileged Identity Manager
    IBM Secret Server, Secret Server, IBM Security Privileged Identity Manager
    Learn More
    Broadcom
    IBM
    Overview
    CA Access Control provides tools to protect your system in both ways against unauthorized use of computer resources: block unauthorized users from accessing the system and block authorized users from accessing items to which they should not have access. CA Access Control also provides auditing tools that let you trace users' activities to track attempted misuse of the computer system.

    IBM Security Secret Server protects privileged accounts from hackers and insider threats, helps ensure compliance with evolving regulations, and allows authorized employees to seamlessly gain access to the tools and information they need to drive productivity. Easily detect, manage and audit privileged accounts, and control which applications are permitted to run on endpoints and servers to prevent malicious applications from penetrating the environment. IBM Security Secret Server is fast to deploy, easy to use and scalable for the enterprise.

    Sample Customers
    Colruyt Group, Logicalis, TIS Inc.
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Insurance Company7%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise44%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Privileged Access Management (PAM)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Privileged Access Management (PAM) while IBM Security Secret Server is ranked 13th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 7 reviews. CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is rated 7.8, while IBM Security Secret Server is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] writes "I like that the access control on the agent. Installation is difficult". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security Secret Server writes "User-friendly, granular features, and is simple to implement, but the technical support could be improved". CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is most compared with , whereas IBM Security Secret Server is most compared with Delinea Secret Server, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Delinea Privileged Access Service.

    See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

    We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.