• Home
  • CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] vs. Infor Risk and Compliance

CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] vs Infor Risk and Compliance comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] and Infor Risk and Compliance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).
To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
I like that the access control on the agent. Installation is difficult.
It gives us the ability to track who is using what ID and for what purpose.
Use Infor Risk and Compliance?
Ranking
Unranked
In Privileged Access Management (PAM)
38th
out of 86 in GRC
Views
145
Comparisons
104
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA Access Control, CA Privileged Identity Manager
Infor Approva, Approva
Learn More
Broadcom
Infor
Overview
CA Access Control provides tools to protect your system in both ways against unauthorized use of computer resources: block unauthorized users from accessing the system and block authorized users from accessing items to which they should not have access. CA Access Control also provides auditing tools that let you trace users' activities to track attempted misuse of the computer system.
Infor Risk and Compliance (Approva) version 10 provides powerful controls monitoring to discover exceptions and violations across key enterprise applications. It offers improved performance, an intuitive user experience, enhanced reporting, and new analytic dashboards to improve visibility into risks. It supports Microsoft SQL Server Standard Edition as its database and reporting server. It has enhanced extraction performance and enriched fuzzy logic algorithms, along with advanced data analysis, and reporting to quickly screen exceptions, identify violations and ultimately minimize exposure to risk.
Sample Customers
Colruyt Group, Logicalis, TIS Inc.
Parkland Health, Denver Public Schools, LL Bean, SEB Group, Hansa Hydrocarbons, World Vision
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Financial Services Firm16%
Educational Organization9%
Real Estate/Law Firm9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise44%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business34%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise57%
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Privileged Access Management (PAM) while Infor Risk and Compliance is ranked 38th in GRC. CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is rated 7.8, while Infor Risk and Compliance is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] writes "I like that the access control on the agent. Installation is difficult". On the other hand, CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Infor Risk and Compliance is most compared with .

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.